This year has been a turbulent year for politics.
Firstly it started off brilliant for Theresa May, she even managed a 20 point lead in the opinion polls over Corbyn's Labour party.
Whereas for Jeremy Corbyn must have felt like hell.
Then we had the snap election, where Theresa May decided to embark on one of the worst campaign trails ever! Giving away her 20 point lead, and allowing Corbyn to get up to 262 seats, bringing the Tory majority down to a Tory minority government.
And since then there's been a tiny Labour lead in the polls. That was until now.
Once again Theresa May has pipped Labour to take the lead. A tiny lead, but a lead at this juncture is better than anything she, and the Conservative Party could have hoped for.
She's shown her grit in dealing with the EU. Naturally the EU have been nasty, rude, and down right awkward ever since Britain decided to leave their clutches.
Yet, Theresa May has stood firm, sometimes it has seemed to her detriment, but in reality, it's for Britain's future.
Suddenly it seems people are seeing that Labour would allow Britain to roll over, and take what was given, despite what the majority of people want.
Hopefully now, this small lead will get the Tory party back behind her once more, and stop trying to hand a government to what would be the worst disaster to happen to Britain in modern time. Jeremy Corbyn!
Tuesday, 12 December 2017
Thursday, 2 November 2017
Westminster Sexual Harassment
What did I say? O'Mara was just the tip of the iceberg.
Michael Fallon, now ex Defense Secretary, has had to resign over his past actions, and no I doubt it was over touching Julia Hartley-Brewer's knee, it seems that there are other incidents as well.
Labour, by an well known activist Bex Bailey, have been accused of covering up an alleged rape. They told her if she spoke out, it would ruin her career.
Labour and the Tories will be absolutely crucified over these scandals. Neither side can try and score a political point.
Damien Green is now being investigated (deputy PM).
But I have to say, it's not the MP's I am so worried about, it's the Lords. We all know that there's been something dodgy about the House of Lords and their sexual activities have been a source of question for decades.
MP's rightly coming under fire for their misconduct, and rightly being persecuted for it. It has obviously gone on too long unchallenged.
I also worry about false allegations, because these will take away from the real victims.
If someone has touched your knee, that is NOT sexual harassment, it is annoying, it is inappropriate sometimes, but it is NOT sexual harassment.
If someone has called you "love", or "darling", or "hun", again this is not always derogatory, and when it is, I find the easiest way is to kill it with kindness, but amazingly I get that language mainly from women, not men.
However on the odd occasion when a man has said it in a derogatory way, I laugh them off.
So please do not take away from the real victims, such as Bex Bailey, or other victims who have genuinely suffered because a political party doesn't want their name being tarnished.
Once again, neither Labour nor the Tories can throw stones, both are in glass houses when it comes to this scandal, and quite rightly both parties should be brought over the coals for covering up such disgusting behaviour!
Michael Fallon, now ex Defense Secretary, has had to resign over his past actions, and no I doubt it was over touching Julia Hartley-Brewer's knee, it seems that there are other incidents as well.
Labour, by an well known activist Bex Bailey, have been accused of covering up an alleged rape. They told her if she spoke out, it would ruin her career.
Labour and the Tories will be absolutely crucified over these scandals. Neither side can try and score a political point.
Damien Green is now being investigated (deputy PM).
But I have to say, it's not the MP's I am so worried about, it's the Lords. We all know that there's been something dodgy about the House of Lords and their sexual activities have been a source of question for decades.
MP's rightly coming under fire for their misconduct, and rightly being persecuted for it. It has obviously gone on too long unchallenged.
I also worry about false allegations, because these will take away from the real victims.
If someone has touched your knee, that is NOT sexual harassment, it is annoying, it is inappropriate sometimes, but it is NOT sexual harassment.
If someone has called you "love", or "darling", or "hun", again this is not always derogatory, and when it is, I find the easiest way is to kill it with kindness, but amazingly I get that language mainly from women, not men.
However on the odd occasion when a man has said it in a derogatory way, I laugh them off.
So please do not take away from the real victims, such as Bex Bailey, or other victims who have genuinely suffered because a political party doesn't want their name being tarnished.
Once again, neither Labour nor the Tories can throw stones, both are in glass houses when it comes to this scandal, and quite rightly both parties should be brought over the coals for covering up such disgusting behaviour!
Friday, 27 October 2017
O'Mara Is Just The Start
What the left wing as a whole hate to admit is, there is a lot of racism, homophobia and misogyny within the Labour Party, and other smaller left wing parties.
They also demonise any people from the LGBTQ+ community for having anything they feel is right-wing/ centre-right political views.
The hypocrisy is astounding from the left. The pretend to be open minded, considerate, and accepting, yet in practice, they are anything but.
If you are part of the LGBTQ+ community, you're not accepted if you don't have left wing views. You're now not accepted if you're a "centrist", and you're hated, and discriminated if you're a Tory.
The violent language of the left, on social media, is vile. And Jared O'Mara is a symptom of it.
However, no one on the left, such as the Labour leader, or the Shadow Chancellor, or their journalist supporters, have the backbone to point out the disgusting abuse that is sent out.
Owen Jones has a bizarre way of showing that he is disgusted by O'Mara's homophobic, misogynistic, racist views. Apparently if you've made disgusting comments 15 years or more so ago, then you should be able to prove you've changed. If it's 8 years or less, then something should be done.
Also, no Tory is allowed to point out that O'Mara, who Labour knew of these comments 4 months before the election, that is a homophobic, misogynistic, racist.
Yet Owen himself will quite gladly hit out at any other politician from any other political party, and apparently will not forgive them either.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn also thought that O'Mara shouldn't have stepped down from the Equality Committee...... what does he think someone like O'Mara could bring? Back to the old days of when women were women, and men were men?!
I have a feeling O'Mara is just a taster of things to come with the new hard left politicians now getting into the Labour Party.
They also demonise any people from the LGBTQ+ community for having anything they feel is right-wing/ centre-right political views.
The hypocrisy is astounding from the left. The pretend to be open minded, considerate, and accepting, yet in practice, they are anything but.
If you are part of the LGBTQ+ community, you're not accepted if you don't have left wing views. You're now not accepted if you're a "centrist", and you're hated, and discriminated if you're a Tory.
The violent language of the left, on social media, is vile. And Jared O'Mara is a symptom of it.
However, no one on the left, such as the Labour leader, or the Shadow Chancellor, or their journalist supporters, have the backbone to point out the disgusting abuse that is sent out.
Owen Jones has a bizarre way of showing that he is disgusted by O'Mara's homophobic, misogynistic, racist views. Apparently if you've made disgusting comments 15 years or more so ago, then you should be able to prove you've changed. If it's 8 years or less, then something should be done.
Also, no Tory is allowed to point out that O'Mara, who Labour knew of these comments 4 months before the election, that is a homophobic, misogynistic, racist.
Yet Owen himself will quite gladly hit out at any other politician from any other political party, and apparently will not forgive them either.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn also thought that O'Mara shouldn't have stepped down from the Equality Committee...... what does he think someone like O'Mara could bring? Back to the old days of when women were women, and men were men?!
I have a feeling O'Mara is just a taster of things to come with the new hard left politicians now getting into the Labour Party.
Friday, 20 October 2017
What Weasels!
How snake like of not only the EU, but Corbyn.
Both parties are trying to undermine Theresa May. What, Corbyn especially, isn't realising is, that if he does undermine her, he undermines us, the people who'll have to deal with the consequences, and that'll be the end of his career.
We're not stupid, we can see what stupid games the EU are playing, and remain voters can't help but think that the sun shines out of the unelected EU President's French backside.
Firstly, why does the EU want to meet a man with absolutely no power? What do they think they'll achieve? Absolutely nothing, because that is what he is.
Secondly, what did Corbyn think he could actually do, other than make Britain look pathetic? Corbyn has the Midas touch, however instead of turning everything into gold, Corbyn turns everything to sh*t.
The fact that he thought he could enhance anything is beyond hilarity, and the fact that he thought that the EU actually cared for what he had to say is sad.
The EU were using him, he was also using them, but sadly for him, Corbyn's is the one who's been rear-ended, not the Prime Minister.
People are laughing at him, not May.
Both parties are trying to undermine Theresa May. What, Corbyn especially, isn't realising is, that if he does undermine her, he undermines us, the people who'll have to deal with the consequences, and that'll be the end of his career.
We're not stupid, we can see what stupid games the EU are playing, and remain voters can't help but think that the sun shines out of the unelected EU President's French backside.
Firstly, why does the EU want to meet a man with absolutely no power? What do they think they'll achieve? Absolutely nothing, because that is what he is.
Secondly, what did Corbyn think he could actually do, other than make Britain look pathetic? Corbyn has the Midas touch, however instead of turning everything into gold, Corbyn turns everything to sh*t.
The fact that he thought he could enhance anything is beyond hilarity, and the fact that he thought that the EU actually cared for what he had to say is sad.
The EU were using him, he was also using them, but sadly for him, Corbyn's is the one who's been rear-ended, not the Prime Minister.
People are laughing at him, not May.
Wednesday, 18 October 2017
Andrew Neil Is Right
The far left, which is now the Labour Party, has got away Scot free with the rise of anti-Semitism within the party.
Started with Ken Livingstone claiming that Hitler, the man who murdered six million Jews, was a Zionist.
Nothing from Corbyn.
Jackie Walker, who just so happens to be a decendant of Jews, a Holocaust denier, suspended, but immediately allowed back. At one point the Guardian colomnist Owen Jones even stated that it "had no justice", for the suspension. That was until she was video recorded spouting her hatred.
The masking of their hatred towards the Jewish community, by saying that they're only against the Israeli leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, and their regime, or even claiming free speech.
Which is ironic as they will not allow any type of criticism towards the Islamic community. What they don't realise is, by oppressing people's right to criticise they're fueling Islamophobia.
No one is stopping people from criticising Netanayhu or his regime, what they are concerned with the is the growing hatred towards to whole Jewish community. And yet, not one person, famous or otherwise has come out st speak against the growth of anti-Semitism, but they'll all come out speaking out against Islamophobia.
The hypocrisy, and irony that the far left cannot see they are as intolerable as the far right, is outstandingly scary.
When will someone from the far left, grow the balls to stand up and say, "This is wrong."? Or am I asking too much?
As we all know Corbyn did issue Shami Chakribarti to do an inquiry into anti-Semitism within the Labour Party, and we all know it wasn't worth the paper it was written on.
Firstly it had no conclusions, or solutions, and secondly, a Jewish Labour MP, Ruth Smeeth, received anti-Semitic abuse right in front of the Labour leader, who stood back and did nothing.
In fact the man who supposedly gave out the anti-Semitic abuse was recorded on video telling Jeremy what he had done, again Corbyn did nothing.
Something needs to be done, otherwise I fear this is only going to grow and grow, and we'll end up with two huge divides, Islamophobes vs anti-Semtics.
Started with Ken Livingstone claiming that Hitler, the man who murdered six million Jews, was a Zionist.
Nothing from Corbyn.
Jackie Walker, who just so happens to be a decendant of Jews, a Holocaust denier, suspended, but immediately allowed back. At one point the Guardian colomnist Owen Jones even stated that it "had no justice", for the suspension. That was until she was video recorded spouting her hatred.
The masking of their hatred towards the Jewish community, by saying that they're only against the Israeli leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, and their regime, or even claiming free speech.
Which is ironic as they will not allow any type of criticism towards the Islamic community. What they don't realise is, by oppressing people's right to criticise they're fueling Islamophobia.
No one is stopping people from criticising Netanayhu or his regime, what they are concerned with the is the growing hatred towards to whole Jewish community. And yet, not one person, famous or otherwise has come out st speak against the growth of anti-Semitism, but they'll all come out speaking out against Islamophobia.
The hypocrisy, and irony that the far left cannot see they are as intolerable as the far right, is outstandingly scary.
When will someone from the far left, grow the balls to stand up and say, "This is wrong."? Or am I asking too much?
As we all know Corbyn did issue Shami Chakribarti to do an inquiry into anti-Semitism within the Labour Party, and we all know it wasn't worth the paper it was written on.
Firstly it had no conclusions, or solutions, and secondly, a Jewish Labour MP, Ruth Smeeth, received anti-Semitic abuse right in front of the Labour leader, who stood back and did nothing.
In fact the man who supposedly gave out the anti-Semitic abuse was recorded on video telling Jeremy what he had done, again Corbyn did nothing.
Something needs to be done, otherwise I fear this is only going to grow and grow, and we'll end up with two huge divides, Islamophobes vs anti-Semtics.
Wednesday, 27 September 2017
#Lab17
What an utter shambles the Labour party are.
Firstly they're cocky, they're acting like the Tories did in 2015, and look where that has got them? A larger vote share, but smaller amount of MP's.
Labour are walking around like they won the 2017 general election, which is far from the truth. They lost, and they lost by quite a bit, they're ignoring the fact that Theresa May won a far greater share of the vote, 43%, something Blair and Thatcher would have killed for.
Secondly, the amount of bullying going on is disgusting.
1. Laura Kuensberg, a BBC journalist, has had to take a bodyguard with her because of the amount of death, rape and other threats she has received from Labour Party members.
Where's the outrage from the "decent" members of the party? Why would you want to be associated with people who cannot abide the fact that there are people who disagree with them?
Also where is Jeremy Corbyn's condemnation of such abhorrent behaviour? He's said a few measly words, but they were as believable as his speech for remaining in the EU.
2. Anti-Semitism is still rife within the Labour Party. People have been openly talking about denying the Holocaust ever happened. Using attacks on the Israeli leadership, or even "free speech" to spew their anti-Semitic views.
What's ironic about this is, people like Corbynista Owen Jones, will say that using free speech to have a priest who doesn't agree with gay marriage is an "abuse of free speech." So surely he'll be writing about how using the alias "free speech" is also abuse to view your racist views? Possibly not, the man is a consistent as a Arsenal's winning streak.
This conference has just proven what a pathetic, wannabe, clique the Labour party has turned into.
Firstly they're cocky, they're acting like the Tories did in 2015, and look where that has got them? A larger vote share, but smaller amount of MP's.
Labour are walking around like they won the 2017 general election, which is far from the truth. They lost, and they lost by quite a bit, they're ignoring the fact that Theresa May won a far greater share of the vote, 43%, something Blair and Thatcher would have killed for.
Secondly, the amount of bullying going on is disgusting.
1. Laura Kuensberg, a BBC journalist, has had to take a bodyguard with her because of the amount of death, rape and other threats she has received from Labour Party members.
Where's the outrage from the "decent" members of the party? Why would you want to be associated with people who cannot abide the fact that there are people who disagree with them?
Also where is Jeremy Corbyn's condemnation of such abhorrent behaviour? He's said a few measly words, but they were as believable as his speech for remaining in the EU.
2. Anti-Semitism is still rife within the Labour Party. People have been openly talking about denying the Holocaust ever happened. Using attacks on the Israeli leadership, or even "free speech" to spew their anti-Semitic views.
What's ironic about this is, people like Corbynista Owen Jones, will say that using free speech to have a priest who doesn't agree with gay marriage is an "abuse of free speech." So surely he'll be writing about how using the alias "free speech" is also abuse to view your racist views? Possibly not, the man is a consistent as a Arsenal's winning streak.
This conference has just proven what a pathetic, wannabe, clique the Labour party has turned into.
Tuesday, 12 September 2017
Repeal Bill
Last night's Repeal Bill, regarding the EU, passed through the House of Commons with a happy majority for Theresa May.
This just proves how incompetent, and pathetic the Labour still are.
The fact that even with the many knives lined up for her back, Theresa May still manages to get her MPs to vote in line with her, and how 7 Labour MPs don't really care for what Jeremy Corbyn is trying to set out.
One of the seven MPs who defied Corbyn was non-other than the Beast of Bolstover, Dennis Skinner. He vote WITH the government, and AGAINST long term friend, and boss Jeremy Corbyn.
Why? Because unlike Corbyn he has stuck to his principles. Skinner has been against the EU for decades, and just because Corbyn is a turncoat, doesn't mean he has to be.
So no I don't believe a staucn Brexiteer like Skinner went against Corbyn, instead he voted with integrity, unlike Corbyn the turncoat.
Looks like Corbyn and his so called "unified" party are anything but, and the power he desperately wants to grab is still far out of reach..... thankfully!
This just proves how incompetent, and pathetic the Labour still are.
The fact that even with the many knives lined up for her back, Theresa May still manages to get her MPs to vote in line with her, and how 7 Labour MPs don't really care for what Jeremy Corbyn is trying to set out.
One of the seven MPs who defied Corbyn was non-other than the Beast of Bolstover, Dennis Skinner. He vote WITH the government, and AGAINST long term friend, and boss Jeremy Corbyn.
Why? Because unlike Corbyn he has stuck to his principles. Skinner has been against the EU for decades, and just because Corbyn is a turncoat, doesn't mean he has to be.
So no I don't believe a staucn Brexiteer like Skinner went against Corbyn, instead he voted with integrity, unlike Corbyn the turncoat.
Looks like Corbyn and his so called "unified" party are anything but, and the power he desperately wants to grab is still far out of reach..... thankfully!
Thursday, 31 August 2017
20 Years On
As we all know, Diana, Princess of Wales, tragically died in a car crash 20 years ago today.
I was only seven, nearly 8 at the time, I remember my nan, and my mum watching the news all day, in utter shock.
I remember seeing people crying outside Buckingham Palace, and Kensington Palace, whilst the hoards of cellophane wrapped flowers grew and grew.
I even remember crying during the funeral because the music made me sad.
I also remember the mood of the public towards the royal family, and I as I look back, I am ashamed of us as a nation.
We bayed for the royals tears, not blood, but tears. We demanded the Queen publicly mourned, we demanded two young boys, who've just lost their mother, cry in front of us.
Basically, I believe, we as a nation, took away the right for the two teenagers to grieve the loss of their mother in private.
Imagine you've just lost your mum, and suddenly the press and the a nation want your grandmother for themselves? Want you to cry your tears in front of them?
You'd be angry, you'd say no. But they didn't, they gave us what we wanted, not what they needed.
How disgusting of us to take away that right from them. I don't believe Diana herself would have wanted her boys to be publicly sort after like that.
Even now we're still demanding to hear how they feel about their mother, about their grief, if they're over it.
So as a nation I believe we owe the Royal family, especially Princes William, and Harry, an apology, because we were selfish, we took away their rights to grieve as we all do ourselves, in private.
I was only seven, nearly 8 at the time, I remember my nan, and my mum watching the news all day, in utter shock.
I remember seeing people crying outside Buckingham Palace, and Kensington Palace, whilst the hoards of cellophane wrapped flowers grew and grew.
I even remember crying during the funeral because the music made me sad.
I also remember the mood of the public towards the royal family, and I as I look back, I am ashamed of us as a nation.
We bayed for the royals tears, not blood, but tears. We demanded the Queen publicly mourned, we demanded two young boys, who've just lost their mother, cry in front of us.
Basically, I believe, we as a nation, took away the right for the two teenagers to grieve the loss of their mother in private.
Imagine you've just lost your mum, and suddenly the press and the a nation want your grandmother for themselves? Want you to cry your tears in front of them?
You'd be angry, you'd say no. But they didn't, they gave us what we wanted, not what they needed.
How disgusting of us to take away that right from them. I don't believe Diana herself would have wanted her boys to be publicly sort after like that.
Even now we're still demanding to hear how they feel about their mother, about their grief, if they're over it.
So as a nation I believe we owe the Royal family, especially Princes William, and Harry, an apology, because we were selfish, we took away their rights to grieve as we all do ourselves, in private.
Tuesday, 8 August 2017
Venezuela
Venezuela is currently going through bankruptcy.
Inflation is at 176%, according to reuters from 7th July last month. The unelected, ex track driver, Maduro, is having anyone who opposes his presidency, which is quickly becoming a dictatorship, either killed or locked up.
The left as a whole are trying to point fingers elsewhere as the rest of the world points out socialism has failed the very people it's supposed to help, the poor.
The poor are even poorer, food banks are empty, no basic medical supplies, whilst Maduro sits quite comfortably with food to eat, and medical care on hand should he need it.
Yet, all people like Jeremy Corbyn supporters can say is "Yeah but, Saudi Arabia."
Yes Saudi is bad, no we shouldn't be arming them, however Theresa May isn't stating that there is an alternative way to live, and Saudi is the best place to be.
Also when Labour were in power, they also sold arms to Saudi, "Yeah but, that was Blair and New Labour." Isn't an argument either.
The fact that Jeremy Corbyn cannot bring himself to condemn the dictator, but instead finds himself condemning "all violence, from all sides"
Not good enough.
Socialism is the path to communism, just look at Cuba, and China.
Cuba doesn't allowed their people to move with gaining permission, not allowed to move jobs without permission, not allowed to take a weeks holiday without permission.
The only union is owned by the Cuban government in which protests, and strikes are illegal, in other words expressing a difference of opinion is illegal.
50% of all your wages the government keep.
Same for China, and what was the Soviet Union. Freedoms are there only for the one in charge, the unelected, brutal dictators, such as Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Fidel.
Socialism has always failed, and will continue to do so.
Why? Because those who say they "believe" in it are also quite happy to live in a capitalist state, using their Apple's or Android devices, to use social media outlets such as Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram.
Or in other cases such as, Owen Jones for instance, he'll damn capitalism, but doesn't mind it when his book has gone to number one.
Or Vivienne Westwood, a self confessed anti-capitalist, yet has one of the most expensive brands out there.
Or Russell Brand, who's had many sold out comedy tours, books, and TV shows.
It's all bad until it benefits them.
This is exactly what's wrong with Corbyn and co refusing to condemn the Mudaro regime, it benefits them not to.
Live like capitalist, talk like a socialist. They all do it, from dictators, to pathetic party leaders, to boring and predictable so called socialists.
Inflation is at 176%, according to reuters from 7th July last month. The unelected, ex track driver, Maduro, is having anyone who opposes his presidency, which is quickly becoming a dictatorship, either killed or locked up.
The left as a whole are trying to point fingers elsewhere as the rest of the world points out socialism has failed the very people it's supposed to help, the poor.
The poor are even poorer, food banks are empty, no basic medical supplies, whilst Maduro sits quite comfortably with food to eat, and medical care on hand should he need it.
Yet, all people like Jeremy Corbyn supporters can say is "Yeah but, Saudi Arabia."
Yes Saudi is bad, no we shouldn't be arming them, however Theresa May isn't stating that there is an alternative way to live, and Saudi is the best place to be.
Also when Labour were in power, they also sold arms to Saudi, "Yeah but, that was Blair and New Labour." Isn't an argument either.
The fact that Jeremy Corbyn cannot bring himself to condemn the dictator, but instead finds himself condemning "all violence, from all sides"
Not good enough.
Socialism is the path to communism, just look at Cuba, and China.
Cuba doesn't allowed their people to move with gaining permission, not allowed to move jobs without permission, not allowed to take a weeks holiday without permission.
The only union is owned by the Cuban government in which protests, and strikes are illegal, in other words expressing a difference of opinion is illegal.
50% of all your wages the government keep.
Same for China, and what was the Soviet Union. Freedoms are there only for the one in charge, the unelected, brutal dictators, such as Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Fidel.
Socialism has always failed, and will continue to do so.
Why? Because those who say they "believe" in it are also quite happy to live in a capitalist state, using their Apple's or Android devices, to use social media outlets such as Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram.
Or in other cases such as, Owen Jones for instance, he'll damn capitalism, but doesn't mind it when his book has gone to number one.
Or Vivienne Westwood, a self confessed anti-capitalist, yet has one of the most expensive brands out there.
Or Russell Brand, who's had many sold out comedy tours, books, and TV shows.
It's all bad until it benefits them.
This is exactly what's wrong with Corbyn and co refusing to condemn the Mudaro regime, it benefits them not to.
Live like capitalist, talk like a socialist. They all do it, from dictators, to pathetic party leaders, to boring and predictable so called socialists.
Saturday, 17 June 2017
Labour's Reaction To The Grenfell Disaster Shows The Depths Of Their Depravity
We don't even know how many have died from the Grenfell Tower disaster yet, and already Labour have tried to make political gains out of their deaths.
What a vile, disgusting, self-centred thing to do, capitalising on deaths of innocence.
Labour seems to know no bounds, there are no depths of depravity they will stoop to.
Yes Theresa May has questions to answer, but so does every single area with a tower block, that includes Lib Dem and Labour constituency's.
I am utterly disgusted at all political parties at the moment, Tories with misreading the public, and buggering up what should have a whitewash of a general election, and Labour with their depths of depravity.
Think about it, Labour are NOT showing compassion, they are showing that they're still campaigning and are trying to use this awful disaster for their political gain...... sickening.
What a vile, disgusting, self-centred thing to do, capitalising on deaths of innocence.
Labour seems to know no bounds, there are no depths of depravity they will stoop to.
Yes Theresa May has questions to answer, but so does every single area with a tower block, that includes Lib Dem and Labour constituency's.
I am utterly disgusted at all political parties at the moment, Tories with misreading the public, and buggering up what should have a whitewash of a general election, and Labour with their depths of depravity.
Think about it, Labour are NOT showing compassion, they are showing that they're still campaigning and are trying to use this awful disaster for their political gain...... sickening.
Friday, 16 June 2017
Grenfell Tower Lessons
Quite rightly people are angry, and demanding answers, and justice for the fire that has killed God knows how many people, and taken away the homes, and possessions people had.
However, for those of you who think it is wise, funny, and clever to try and take over this protest, and I don't normally stand up for protests, by beating up cameramen, and causing havoc, you are taking away from the cause of why people are there in the first place.
Yes, Theresa May, and even the Labour Party, have a lot to answer for, as it seems to me saving on spending, versus people lives, was more important.
This is disgusting, vile, and downright Dickensian.
This is something you'd expect to hear about when Queen Victoria was on the throne, not something we should hear about in the 21st Century.
Yes protest, yes demand answers, yes be angry, because without anger no change can be made, and I've always said, anger is a dangerous emotion to play with, because thats when things start to happen, and usually the people at the top are public enemy number one, and for the enemy is not only the Tories, but Labour too.
Both parties have failed in making sure that lives have been put first, both parties have made sure that their paymasters are happy, not the voters that get them where they are in the first place.
Both parties need to take a long hard look at themselves, and realise people won't, and don't, take these completely preventable atrocities lying down, and quite rightly.
Things need to change, party politics needs to change, both parties need to remind themselves that the real paymasters of their success are us, the voters, the everyday Joe's who go to work, pay our taxes, fund their spending habits.
Grenfell needs to be a bloody well tough lesson to all politicians, life will not go down without a fight. You've awoken the monster, you now deal with it.
However, for those of you who think it is wise, funny, and clever to try and take over this protest, and I don't normally stand up for protests, by beating up cameramen, and causing havoc, you are taking away from the cause of why people are there in the first place.
Yes, Theresa May, and even the Labour Party, have a lot to answer for, as it seems to me saving on spending, versus people lives, was more important.
This is disgusting, vile, and downright Dickensian.
This is something you'd expect to hear about when Queen Victoria was on the throne, not something we should hear about in the 21st Century.
Yes protest, yes demand answers, yes be angry, because without anger no change can be made, and I've always said, anger is a dangerous emotion to play with, because thats when things start to happen, and usually the people at the top are public enemy number one, and for the enemy is not only the Tories, but Labour too.
Both parties have failed in making sure that lives have been put first, both parties have made sure that their paymasters are happy, not the voters that get them where they are in the first place.
Both parties need to take a long hard look at themselves, and realise people won't, and don't, take these completely preventable atrocities lying down, and quite rightly.
Things need to change, party politics needs to change, both parties need to remind themselves that the real paymasters of their success are us, the voters, the everyday Joe's who go to work, pay our taxes, fund their spending habits.
Grenfell needs to be a bloody well tough lesson to all politicians, life will not go down without a fight. You've awoken the monster, you now deal with it.
Sunday, 4 June 2017
Labour Will See Britain Fall
People try to have ago at Theresa May for her time as Home Secretary, despite the fact she did more in 6 years than any Labour Home Secretary did in 13 years.
Hate preachers such as Abu Qatada and Abu Hamsa under Labour were protected, Theresa May deported them.
Gary McKinnon, an aspergers sufferer who managed to hack into the American Intelligence files, would have been deported to the USA under Labour, Theresa May saved his life, as it was very clear that had he have been deported he would have taken his own life.
Firstly Corbyn recently said that "I am not happy with the shoot to kill policy." After three attacks in Britain, is this the type of leader we need?
Reminder that all the hackings, such as the hacking of murdered teenager Milly Dowler phone, happened under a Labour government.
Labour had 13 years to set up an inquiry to get the truth about what truly happened at Hillsborough, instead it was a Tory lead coalition government.
Labour started the war in Iraq on false pretences, and as the Chilcot Inquiry heard, there were other avenues that Labour could have gone down, yet failed to.
Labour sold our gold reserve for its lowest ever value. How? Because the then Chancellor decided to announce it before selling it, allowing the price to drop to ridiculous levels.
Every single Labour government that has ever been has left unemployment higher than when it entered office.
Corbyn, and two of his Shadow Cabinet members (McDonnell Shad Chancellor, & Abbott Shad Home Secretary) supported the IRA cause, with McDonnell claiming that "it's about time we started honouring those people involved in the armed struggle. It was the bombs and bullets and sacrifice made by the likes of Bobby Sands that brought Britain to the negotiating table."
Diane Abbott said "A defeat in Northern Ireland would be a defeat indeed."
Corbyn himself stood for minutes silence for 8 dead IRA would be bombers. Although he trying to re-write history and say it was a ceremony remembering everyone killed. This is a lie.
Another lie Corbyn spews is how he never met any members of the IRA in the 80's, here he is with his IRA leader friend.
Hate preachers such as Abu Qatada and Abu Hamsa under Labour were protected, Theresa May deported them.
Gary McKinnon, an aspergers sufferer who managed to hack into the American Intelligence files, would have been deported to the USA under Labour, Theresa May saved his life, as it was very clear that had he have been deported he would have taken his own life.
Firstly Corbyn recently said that "I am not happy with the shoot to kill policy." After three attacks in Britain, is this the type of leader we need?
Corbyn also proudly announce in 2011 that he had voted against every single anti-terror legislation since he became an MP in 1983.
Labour had 13 years to set up an inquiry to get the truth about what truly happened at Hillsborough, instead it was a Tory lead coalition government.
Labour started the war in Iraq on false pretences, and as the Chilcot Inquiry heard, there were other avenues that Labour could have gone down, yet failed to.
Labour sold our gold reserve for its lowest ever value. How? Because the then Chancellor decided to announce it before selling it, allowing the price to drop to ridiculous levels.
Every single Labour government that has ever been has left unemployment higher than when it entered office.
Corbyn, and two of his Shadow Cabinet members (McDonnell Shad Chancellor, & Abbott Shad Home Secretary) supported the IRA cause, with McDonnell claiming that "it's about time we started honouring those people involved in the armed struggle. It was the bombs and bullets and sacrifice made by the likes of Bobby Sands that brought Britain to the negotiating table."
Diane Abbott said "A defeat in Northern Ireland would be a defeat indeed."
Corbyn himself stood for minutes silence for 8 dead IRA would be bombers. Although he trying to re-write history and say it was a ceremony remembering everyone killed. This is a lie.
Another lie Corbyn spews is how he never met any members of the IRA in the 80's, here he is with his IRA leader friend.
Jeremy Corbyn also described terrorists such as Hamas and Hezbollah as friends. Whether this was just left wing terminology or not, saying this is an insult to all who have been maimed and murdered at the hands of these barbarians. He invited them for a chat in parliament, fat lot of good that's done....
Jeremy Corbyn would also give the Falkland Islands to Argentina, despite the Falklander's, only a few years ago, voting in overwhelming support to stay part of the UK. Out of a possible 1516 votes, 1513 people voted for, 3 voted against. Proof Corbyn has no regard for democracy.
Another example for how Corbyn has no regard for democracy, if there is a hung parliament he'd rely on the Liberal Democrats, who want to overturn the votes of 17.5 million people, and stay within the EU. As well as sidling up to the Britain hating SNP.
Corbyn has also voted against his own party over 500 times, if he can't be loyal to his own party, how on earth could he be loyal to Britain?
He "campaigned" for Britain to remain within the EU, despite decades of campaigning against the EU. Here he is saying what he really feels about the EU.
Conservatives have seen unemployment drop, raised tax free allowance for the lowest paid, if you're earning £12k a year, you now take home £11,500 under Labour you took home just under half of that.
Conservatives have also raised the minimum wage, police budget, spending on NHS, transport, defence, and education.
It always takes a Conservative government to make the difficult decisions such as austerity measures, because Labour have not budgeted correctly. Hence the IFS damning review of their manifesto, claiming it would do more harm to Britain than good.
So on Thursday, vote Conservative, it's the only safe choice.
Wednesday, 31 May 2017
#BBCDebate
What a sorry bunch of so called "leaders", the only winner? Theresa May for not turning up!
Some say she's running scared, and you're probably right, of the sorry, childish, incompetent bunch of leaders.
Squabbling like children in a playground over who's got the best dad (I do by the way).
Over talking, over shouting, not answering. The only decently behaved wasn't even a leader of a party, and that was Amber Rudd.
She was composed, dignified whilst being vilified, from each and everyone else on that panel.
Why do anyone of the others deserve to be elected after that shambles?
Some say she's running scared, and you're probably right, of the sorry, childish, incompetent bunch of leaders.
Squabbling like children in a playground over who's got the best dad (I do by the way).
Over talking, over shouting, not answering. The only decently behaved wasn't even a leader of a party, and that was Amber Rudd.
She was composed, dignified whilst being vilified, from each and everyone else on that panel.
Why do anyone of the others deserve to be elected after that shambles?
Friday, 26 May 2017
Coward
Just when I thought Jeremy Corbyn couldn't get any lower in my expectations, he then blames us & British Foreign policies for the attack in Manchester on Monday, that killed 22 young people.
In essence what Corbyn is doing is giving these murdering, cowardly scumbags an excuse to carry on killing innocence.
He backed the IRA, he's called terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah friends, as well as inviting these homophobic, women hating wank stains into parliament for chats.
Jeremy Corbyn is not a man of peace, nor is he a man who backs Britain.
How can anyone in their right mind, vote for such a despicable, two faced, lying, cowardly, terrorist sympathising wimp such as him?
Addition:
Again Jeremy today has blamed British foreign policy on terrorist attacks, but here is another way how his point is made redundant.
France, Belgium, and Sweden didn't go into the Iraq war why were they attacked?
Italy, Poland, and Bulgaria did go to either Afghanistan or Iraq and they haven't been attacked, why?
Also, what foreign policy have the Yazidis, Hazaras, and Shiites got to do with ISIS massacring them?
Problem for Corbyn, he has no answers.
In essence what Corbyn is doing is giving these murdering, cowardly scumbags an excuse to carry on killing innocence.
He backed the IRA, he's called terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah friends, as well as inviting these homophobic, women hating wank stains into parliament for chats.
Jeremy Corbyn is not a man of peace, nor is he a man who backs Britain.
How can anyone in their right mind, vote for such a despicable, two faced, lying, cowardly, terrorist sympathising wimp such as him?
Addition:
Again Jeremy today has blamed British foreign policy on terrorist attacks, but here is another way how his point is made redundant.
France, Belgium, and Sweden didn't go into the Iraq war why were they attacked?
Italy, Poland, and Bulgaria did go to either Afghanistan or Iraq and they haven't been attacked, why?
Also, what foreign policy have the Yazidis, Hazaras, and Shiites got to do with ISIS massacring them?
Problem for Corbyn, he has no answers.
Wednesday, 24 May 2017
Are Politicians Bullet Proof?
I've read time and time again, since the awful news broke about the Manchester bombing at an Ariana Grande concert, that politicians live in a bullet proof world.
Tell that to Jo Cox.... you can't because she was shot dead by some nutjob who doesn't deserve to be named.
Tell that to Airey Neave.... again you can't because he killed outside Parliament in 1979 by the IRA
Tell that to Rev. Robert Bradford, Sir Anthony Beery, and Ian Gow..... you can't because they were all victims of the IRA.
Even the royal family were effected by terrorism when the IRA killed Prince Charles's favourite uncle, Lord Mountbatten on a family holiday in a boat, County Sligo.
Politicians are not living in bullet proof worlds, to believe such a thing is ignorance.
Tell that to Jo Cox.... you can't because she was shot dead by some nutjob who doesn't deserve to be named.
Tell that to Airey Neave.... again you can't because he killed outside Parliament in 1979 by the IRA
Tell that to Rev. Robert Bradford, Sir Anthony Beery, and Ian Gow..... you can't because they were all victims of the IRA.
Even the royal family were effected by terrorism when the IRA killed Prince Charles's favourite uncle, Lord Mountbatten on a family holiday in a boat, County Sligo.
Politicians are not living in bullet proof worlds, to believe such a thing is ignorance.
Monday, 22 May 2017
Corbyn Is King of U-Turns
Jeremy Corbyn today has come out against Theresa May for apparently u-turning on the social health care policy for dementia patients.
This is rather hilarious, and completely hypocritical, here's Corbyn's two biggest u-turns.
1. The EU. For decades, and decades the Labour leader campaigned alongside Tony Benn, for Britain to leave the EU for it's undemocratic workings. However when he became Labour leader, and Cameron gave us the referendum, he suddenly had a change of hearts and "campaigned" for remain.
2. Trident. Another policy the Labour leader has campaigned for decades for Britain to lose it's nuclear deterrent, again he appears to have had a change of heart, and has now said if he should win, Britain would keep Trident.
Jeremy Corbyn is not honest, is not honourable, and is not decent, he is a power hungry Marxist who wants to put Britain into financial ruin, whilst sidling up to the terrorist likes of Sinn Fein, Hamas, and Hezbollah.
This is rather hilarious, and completely hypocritical, here's Corbyn's two biggest u-turns.
1. The EU. For decades, and decades the Labour leader campaigned alongside Tony Benn, for Britain to leave the EU for it's undemocratic workings. However when he became Labour leader, and Cameron gave us the referendum, he suddenly had a change of hearts and "campaigned" for remain.
2. Trident. Another policy the Labour leader has campaigned for decades for Britain to lose it's nuclear deterrent, again he appears to have had a change of heart, and has now said if he should win, Britain would keep Trident.
Jeremy Corbyn is not honest, is not honourable, and is not decent, he is a power hungry Marxist who wants to put Britain into financial ruin, whilst sidling up to the terrorist likes of Sinn Fein, Hamas, and Hezbollah.
Sunday, 21 May 2017
What A Shambles!
I am not a Jeremy Corbyn fan, however I always used to say, and believe that at least you knew where you stood with him.
That's until today.
Apparently Corbyn has said if he is elected Britain will keep Trident, our nuclear deterrent, despite decades of campaigning for Britain to get rid of it.
Corbyn also refused to condemn the IRA 5 times today, with an interview with Sophy Ridge on Sky News, you can watch the full interview here, instead he said bombs on all sides were wrong.
Yes, they are, however the IRA made up for 60% of all bombs that were dropped, what he failed to condemn were the shootings, such as Jean McConville, who was kidnapped, shot and buried in a secret location by the IRA.
Also his stance on the EU last year was another U-turn the Labour leader has committed too, again after decades of campaigning against the undemocratic EU, he suddenly had a change of hearts of campaigned for us to remain.
Jeremy Corbyn is meant to be a man of principles, from what I can see he's a man who'll do anything to hold to power.
Tuesday, 16 May 2017
Don't Be Fooled
Jeremy Corbyn is planning some nice looking policies, but that's all they are, nice looking, they'll damage the economy, jobs, and prices will rise even further.
Here he is screaming about the debt the Tories have put on the economy, despite the fact that he straight away wants to add a minimum of £503bn, that's half a trillion pounds minimum, and straight away.
Who'll pay for that? You will, yes and the rich but they can't pay for everything, therefore taxes on you will have to rise, meaning while the cost of living rises, the government takes more of your hard earned money away from you to spend on how they want.
Remember the Tories raised tax allowance to £11,500, which means if you're earning £12k per annum, you're only being taxed for £500 for a whole year, you are taking home nearly every single bit you earn.
Labour want to take your earnings away from you to pay for their ideologies.
No the rich won't stay to be taxed, why would they?
There is plenty of evidence to prove Labour's new policies don't benefit those of who it is supposed to.
Just look at the Soviet Union, no freedom, starvation (which at one point led to people turning to cannibalism to survive), bad health, bad education, and ended up with one Soviet leader overseeing the deaths of around 39-52 million people.
That leader was Josef Stalin, who had gulags (basically copied the idea of concentration camps from the newly defeated Hitler), and who the Shadow Chancellor also admires and has spoken at many rallies with Stalin's face being proudly shown.
Also Corbyn himself is no angel, his history shows that he supported the IRA, John McDonnell (Shad Chance) thought that the terrorists who killed scores of innocence, should have been rewarded.
Recently Jeremy Corbyn refused to condemn the IRA, and put the phone down instead of answering the question, 5-6 times! You can listen here.
As for those who are trying to re-write history and say he was there for peace talks, and talking bulls*t and it stinks.
Also calling homophobic, women hating Hamas and Hezbollah friends and inviting them for talks to parliament.
Jeremy isn't a peaceful guy, he also has spoken at many rallies where banners, and posters of violence were also being proudly displayed, he never said a word against them.
Another problem Corbyn and his far left wing team have is anti-Semitism.
Last year Corbyn appointed Shami Chakribarti to do a inquiry into anti-Semitism in Labour, thanks to Ken (can't help but mention Hitler) Livingstone proclaimed that Hitler was a Zionist, despite the fact that the German dictator oversaw the deaths of 6 million jews.
During the press statement of the conclusion into the inquiry Ruth Smeeth, a Jewish Labour MP, found herself receiving anti-Semitic abuse from a Corbynista, what did Corbyn do? Nothing.
What did Corbyn do when the bully openly in front of cameras told Corbyn of his proud achievement? Absolutely nothing.
Let alone the fact that Corbyn has had over 18 months of being Labour leader, and hasn't been able to unify his party, as he promised he would do when first elected.
How on earth can he sort out a country?
Another problem he faces? His Shadow Chancellor doesn't know what Britain's deficit is, he had to be handed a piece of paper to answer a simple question by BBC's Nick Robinson.
Then there's Diane Abbott, who claims it would cost £80m a year to fund 10,000 extra policemen and women, which adds up to £8,000 per man.... not exactly living wage.
Why on earth would anyone in their right mind vote such incompetency, hatred, and ignorance to lead our great nation?
Here he is screaming about the debt the Tories have put on the economy, despite the fact that he straight away wants to add a minimum of £503bn, that's half a trillion pounds minimum, and straight away.
Who'll pay for that? You will, yes and the rich but they can't pay for everything, therefore taxes on you will have to rise, meaning while the cost of living rises, the government takes more of your hard earned money away from you to spend on how they want.
Remember the Tories raised tax allowance to £11,500, which means if you're earning £12k per annum, you're only being taxed for £500 for a whole year, you are taking home nearly every single bit you earn.
Labour want to take your earnings away from you to pay for their ideologies.
No the rich won't stay to be taxed, why would they?
There is plenty of evidence to prove Labour's new policies don't benefit those of who it is supposed to.
Just look at the Soviet Union, no freedom, starvation (which at one point led to people turning to cannibalism to survive), bad health, bad education, and ended up with one Soviet leader overseeing the deaths of around 39-52 million people.
That leader was Josef Stalin, who had gulags (basically copied the idea of concentration camps from the newly defeated Hitler), and who the Shadow Chancellor also admires and has spoken at many rallies with Stalin's face being proudly shown.
Also Corbyn himself is no angel, his history shows that he supported the IRA, John McDonnell (Shad Chance) thought that the terrorists who killed scores of innocence, should have been rewarded.
Recently Jeremy Corbyn refused to condemn the IRA, and put the phone down instead of answering the question, 5-6 times! You can listen here.
As for those who are trying to re-write history and say he was there for peace talks, and talking bulls*t and it stinks.
Also calling homophobic, women hating Hamas and Hezbollah friends and inviting them for talks to parliament.
Jeremy isn't a peaceful guy, he also has spoken at many rallies where banners, and posters of violence were also being proudly displayed, he never said a word against them.
Another problem Corbyn and his far left wing team have is anti-Semitism.
Last year Corbyn appointed Shami Chakribarti to do a inquiry into anti-Semitism in Labour, thanks to Ken (can't help but mention Hitler) Livingstone proclaimed that Hitler was a Zionist, despite the fact that the German dictator oversaw the deaths of 6 million jews.
During the press statement of the conclusion into the inquiry Ruth Smeeth, a Jewish Labour MP, found herself receiving anti-Semitic abuse from a Corbynista, what did Corbyn do? Nothing.
What did Corbyn do when the bully openly in front of cameras told Corbyn of his proud achievement? Absolutely nothing.
Let alone the fact that Corbyn has had over 18 months of being Labour leader, and hasn't been able to unify his party, as he promised he would do when first elected.
How on earth can he sort out a country?
Another problem he faces? His Shadow Chancellor doesn't know what Britain's deficit is, he had to be handed a piece of paper to answer a simple question by BBC's Nick Robinson.
Then there's Diane Abbott, who claims it would cost £80m a year to fund 10,000 extra policemen and women, which adds up to £8,000 per man.... not exactly living wage.
Why on earth would anyone in their right mind vote such incompetency, hatred, and ignorance to lead our great nation?
Friday, 5 May 2017
Don't Blame The Media
After Labour's, so far, terrible night for teh local elections, John McDonnell has come out blaming the media for Corbyn's bad look with the public.
Again, I will point out just a few instances where Corbyn, McDonnell & co only have themselves to blame.
1. "Bombs and Bullets could unite Ireland" said John McDonnell himself, in reference to supporting the IRA, he also said that those who disagreed with Sinn Fein should have their knees blown off.
2. Corbyn called Hamas & Hezbollah (the homophobic, women hating terrorists) friends, and invited them to parliament for a chat, possibly over a cup of tea, who knows.
3. Corbyn also thought that it was a good idea to make a political statement by not singing the national anthem at an event commemorating the soldiers who died for our freedoms
4. Back to McDonnell again, when he thought it was a good idea to make a joke about the Tories partnering up to China, he decided to bring out "Mao's Little Red Book", Mao being the name who killed around 60 million people is no joking matter
5. Diane Abbott not knowing her figures when asked about how much it would cost for an extra 10,000 police officers on the street. If you haven't heard it yet, (which I doubt) you can so here
6. Jon Ashworth, Shadow Secretary of State of Health, was repeatedly asked (even shouted at) by Piers Morgan is Labour would use Nuclear weapons if we were fired at, eventually Jon managed to yes (by this point Piers had lost his voice)
7. Corbyn, despite calling himself a feminist, gave all of the so called "top 5 jobs" within the Shadow Cabinet team, to men.
8. His ability to deal with the obvious growing anti-Antisemitism within the Labour party is particularly painful to watch. First of putting Ken "Hitler obsessed" Livingstone on the NEC was not a good idea, then during the press release of the inquiry into anti-Antisemitism within Labour, a Labour politician was "outed" by a Momentum Corbynista, and was overheard telling Jeremy Corbyn he had done so.
The MP was Ruth Smeeth, she walked out of the room visibly upset, and according to witnesses was even reduced to tears, Corbyn did nothing.
9. Jeremy also, when the IRA's bombing was at its height, stood for a minutes silence for 8 dead IRA terrorists. (Man of peace?)
10. Think I'll end with a John McDonnell favourite, when he said if he could travel back in time he would assassinate Margaret Thatcher.... lovely
So there's just 10 reasons why Labour have no-one but themselves to blame for what is looking more and more like a disastrous Labour Party defeat in just over a months time.
Again, I will point out just a few instances where Corbyn, McDonnell & co only have themselves to blame.
1. "Bombs and Bullets could unite Ireland" said John McDonnell himself, in reference to supporting the IRA, he also said that those who disagreed with Sinn Fein should have their knees blown off.
2. Corbyn called Hamas & Hezbollah (the homophobic, women hating terrorists) friends, and invited them to parliament for a chat, possibly over a cup of tea, who knows.
3. Corbyn also thought that it was a good idea to make a political statement by not singing the national anthem at an event commemorating the soldiers who died for our freedoms
4. Back to McDonnell again, when he thought it was a good idea to make a joke about the Tories partnering up to China, he decided to bring out "Mao's Little Red Book", Mao being the name who killed around 60 million people is no joking matter
5. Diane Abbott not knowing her figures when asked about how much it would cost for an extra 10,000 police officers on the street. If you haven't heard it yet, (which I doubt) you can so here
6. Jon Ashworth, Shadow Secretary of State of Health, was repeatedly asked (even shouted at) by Piers Morgan is Labour would use Nuclear weapons if we were fired at, eventually Jon managed to yes (by this point Piers had lost his voice)
7. Corbyn, despite calling himself a feminist, gave all of the so called "top 5 jobs" within the Shadow Cabinet team, to men.
8. His ability to deal with the obvious growing anti-Antisemitism within the Labour party is particularly painful to watch. First of putting Ken "Hitler obsessed" Livingstone on the NEC was not a good idea, then during the press release of the inquiry into anti-Antisemitism within Labour, a Labour politician was "outed" by a Momentum Corbynista, and was overheard telling Jeremy Corbyn he had done so.
The MP was Ruth Smeeth, she walked out of the room visibly upset, and according to witnesses was even reduced to tears, Corbyn did nothing.
9. Jeremy also, when the IRA's bombing was at its height, stood for a minutes silence for 8 dead IRA terrorists. (Man of peace?)
10. Think I'll end with a John McDonnell favourite, when he said if he could travel back in time he would assassinate Margaret Thatcher.... lovely
So there's just 10 reasons why Labour have no-one but themselves to blame for what is looking more and more like a disastrous Labour Party defeat in just over a months time.
Monday, 1 May 2017
The Leak Of Juncker & May's Dinner Proves Leaving Was Right
A German newspaper has leaked the meal between Theresa May, and EU President Jean Claude Juncker.
It basically transpires that the EU have no care for Britain, and want what they can get out of us. They also said May was "living in a different galaxy", how diplomatic of them!
To me this just proves that voting to leave the EU was the correct thing to do. Why on earth would anyone want to stay part of an institution that has no regard for anyone else but lining their own pockets?
Greece is a prime example of how little the EU actually cares for what you need, or want.
In 2016 the Greek people voted in far left party Syriza. I am not a socialist, but I am a believer in democracy, therefore, the socialist party should have been allowed to carry out the socialist promises they had made.
The unelected EU said no, and ordered them to take to the austerity measures they had given the previous government, so Syriza ordered a referendum, and asked the Greek people to vote no, against the austerity measures the EU had set out.
The country voted with the Greek government, and what did the EU do? Gave them harsher austerity measures.
The EU is not a good thing, it is greedy, it is self satisfying, and it doesn't care for us people down here. We are just the tools for them to make their money.
Leaving was the right thing to do, now they can't have their grubby little clutches over our future!
The fact that people are taking this, yes disastrous, meal as May's fault it beyond pathetic.
We're only hearing one side, and that side doesn't care for the other side.
The EU will want to bleed Britain dry before we actually leave, as the greed from the likes of Juncker, and Merkel is outstanding and it surprises me that so many left wingers wanted to stay part of such a greedy institution.
It basically transpires that the EU have no care for Britain, and want what they can get out of us. They also said May was "living in a different galaxy", how diplomatic of them!
To me this just proves that voting to leave the EU was the correct thing to do. Why on earth would anyone want to stay part of an institution that has no regard for anyone else but lining their own pockets?
Greece is a prime example of how little the EU actually cares for what you need, or want.
In 2016 the Greek people voted in far left party Syriza. I am not a socialist, but I am a believer in democracy, therefore, the socialist party should have been allowed to carry out the socialist promises they had made.
The unelected EU said no, and ordered them to take to the austerity measures they had given the previous government, so Syriza ordered a referendum, and asked the Greek people to vote no, against the austerity measures the EU had set out.
The country voted with the Greek government, and what did the EU do? Gave them harsher austerity measures.
The EU is not a good thing, it is greedy, it is self satisfying, and it doesn't care for us people down here. We are just the tools for them to make their money.
Leaving was the right thing to do, now they can't have their grubby little clutches over our future!
The fact that people are taking this, yes disastrous, meal as May's fault it beyond pathetic.
We're only hearing one side, and that side doesn't care for the other side.
The EU will want to bleed Britain dry before we actually leave, as the greed from the likes of Juncker, and Merkel is outstanding and it surprises me that so many left wingers wanted to stay part of such a greedy institution.
Sunday, 30 April 2017
General Election 2017
As Theresa May is making this snap election all about Brexit I found it rather amazing when, today on Andrew Marr's show, two staunch remain campaigners gave one wonderful reason, without realising it, why voting to leave the EU was the best thing Britain ever did.
Rachel Johnson, sister of Boris Johnson, and Owen Jones both agreed on one thing.
The EU doesn't care what people, us voters, want, all they care about is what's good for their pockets.
They both pointed out that last year, when the far left party Syriza in Greece were voted in, the EU didn't care, and when Syriza gave the Greek people a referendum to vote no to harsher austerity measures, the EU carried on regardless of the people's will.
To mean this just strengthens the reasons why 17 million voted to leave the uncaring, undemocratic European Union.
So I thank both remain voters, Rachel and Owen, for giving a bloody good reason why it is best that the British voted to leave, you, for me, have done a better job than any Brexiteer has ever done!
Rachel Johnson, sister of Boris Johnson, and Owen Jones both agreed on one thing.
The EU doesn't care what people, us voters, want, all they care about is what's good for their pockets.
They both pointed out that last year, when the far left party Syriza in Greece were voted in, the EU didn't care, and when Syriza gave the Greek people a referendum to vote no to harsher austerity measures, the EU carried on regardless of the people's will.
To mean this just strengthens the reasons why 17 million voted to leave the uncaring, undemocratic European Union.
So I thank both remain voters, Rachel and Owen, for giving a bloody good reason why it is best that the British voted to leave, you, for me, have done a better job than any Brexiteer has ever done!
Tuesday, 11 April 2017
More, more, more!
Jeremy Corbyn, the man who wants more!
He wants to borrow £500 million, in which he'll build a million news homes (despite the social housing waiting list being 5 million long), "secure our NHS and social care", as well as better funding for the arts.
He also wants to raise corporation tax, and the minimum wage.
Small businesses, like the one I work for, will crumble, as they'll be the ones who'll be expected to foot the £500 million bill, as well as pay more corp tax, and wages.
Jeremy's way of helping? Ensuring there is no such thing as a late payer.
What Jeremy fails to realise is, being paid on time won't help foot the bill of their beloved borrowing, nor will it help to make sure there's enough money in the bank to pay their employees wages, as they'll have to put aside for their every growing corp tax bill.
This means small businesses will have to raise their prices as their wage bill, corp tax and a hefty bill will have to be factored into their yearly forecasts.
When prices rise, this means people will look for the cheapest option, namely large corporations, who won't have to worry as much as small businesses, as their profits are already within the millions, if not billions.
Therefore small businesses will end up bust anyway.
Then again, we shouldn't be surprised at Corbyn's hated for the entrepreneur, the idea that someone wants to be in charge of their own destiny and not have to rely on the state must make his socialist skin crawl!
He wants to borrow £500 million, in which he'll build a million news homes (despite the social housing waiting list being 5 million long), "secure our NHS and social care", as well as better funding for the arts.
He also wants to raise corporation tax, and the minimum wage.
Small businesses, like the one I work for, will crumble, as they'll be the ones who'll be expected to foot the £500 million bill, as well as pay more corp tax, and wages.
Jeremy's way of helping? Ensuring there is no such thing as a late payer.
What Jeremy fails to realise is, being paid on time won't help foot the bill of their beloved borrowing, nor will it help to make sure there's enough money in the bank to pay their employees wages, as they'll have to put aside for their every growing corp tax bill.
This means small businesses will have to raise their prices as their wage bill, corp tax and a hefty bill will have to be factored into their yearly forecasts.
When prices rise, this means people will look for the cheapest option, namely large corporations, who won't have to worry as much as small businesses, as their profits are already within the millions, if not billions.
Therefore small businesses will end up bust anyway.
Then again, we shouldn't be surprised at Corbyn's hated for the entrepreneur, the idea that someone wants to be in charge of their own destiny and not have to rely on the state must make his socialist skin crawl!
Tuesday, 4 April 2017
Opposition? What Opposition
What the hell is going on in the Labour Party?
Firstly Jeremy Corbyn doesn't seem to have realised he is now responsible for the second most major political party in the UK, he is no longer a back bench rebel that nobody pays attention to.
His politics politics are now main stream, his decisions are now accountable, and he now has an actual possibly chance of becoming Britain's next Prime Minister (although if the polls are anything to go by he hasn't a hope in hell).
If he can't handle the heat as opposition leader, and he doesn't enjoy his leadership being questioned, how does he think he'd ever cope as Prime Minister?
This isn't Labour's only problem, they've let Ken "Hitler supported Zionism" Livingstone off the hook, and suspended him for a year... woop de do.
Jewish Labour MP Ruth Smeeth isn't happy, and I don't blame her. Firstly Labour DOES have an anti-Semitism problem. During Shami Chakrabarti's Press statement of her "inquiry" into the issue, was less than smooth.
Ruth Smeeth received anti-Semitic bullying during the press statement, and the Labour leader sat by as the Ruth walked out of the room noticeably upset, according to sources she was even crying.
Corbyn, who was at the press statement, sat back and did nothing. The bully was even overheard on camera talking to Corbyn, as they left, saying that he had "outed Smeeth for talking to the Torygraph", again Corbyn had no reaction, other than to smile.
Labour need a new leader, and they need one bad. Jeremy and co seem hell bent on making sure the country is denied having someone holding the government to account, and this is also bad for Tories, not only Labour.
Jeremy may have principles, he may be a nice bloke, but we must all agree that he a shite leader, and that is not good for Britain.
Firstly Jeremy Corbyn doesn't seem to have realised he is now responsible for the second most major political party in the UK, he is no longer a back bench rebel that nobody pays attention to.
His politics politics are now main stream, his decisions are now accountable, and he now has an actual possibly chance of becoming Britain's next Prime Minister (although if the polls are anything to go by he hasn't a hope in hell).
If he can't handle the heat as opposition leader, and he doesn't enjoy his leadership being questioned, how does he think he'd ever cope as Prime Minister?
This isn't Labour's only problem, they've let Ken "Hitler supported Zionism" Livingstone off the hook, and suspended him for a year... woop de do.
Jewish Labour MP Ruth Smeeth isn't happy, and I don't blame her. Firstly Labour DOES have an anti-Semitism problem. During Shami Chakrabarti's Press statement of her "inquiry" into the issue, was less than smooth.
Ruth Smeeth received anti-Semitic bullying during the press statement, and the Labour leader sat by as the Ruth walked out of the room noticeably upset, according to sources she was even crying.
Corbyn, who was at the press statement, sat back and did nothing. The bully was even overheard on camera talking to Corbyn, as they left, saying that he had "outed Smeeth for talking to the Torygraph", again Corbyn had no reaction, other than to smile.
Labour need a new leader, and they need one bad. Jeremy and co seem hell bent on making sure the country is denied having someone holding the government to account, and this is also bad for Tories, not only Labour.
Jeremy may have principles, he may be a nice bloke, but we must all agree that he a shite leader, and that is not good for Britain.
Sunday, 2 April 2017
Ed Miliband
Ed Miliband has almost become a bit of a fallen hero for Labour supporters.
No, not amongst Corbynista's, but for the so called "moderates", it's like they've almost forgotten just how pathetic he was.
So let's start by reminding ourselves just how and why he was unelected.
1. Ironically the EU referendum. Miliband did not want to give the people a choice, or a say in their own future.
2. Energy Freezing, only for the prices to fall soon after this policy was announced
3. Giving 2p to homeless woman he walked past.
4. When asked in an interview if he knew the average amount one family spends on food per week "£70-£80 a week." Oh dear....
5. Not knowing who rather important people within the Labour party were "You do know who Jim Grant is?"
EM "Well you'll enlightenment me I am sure."
Int "Swindon Labour leader."
6. How many inquiries did he want again? Independent, public, judge led.
7. Forgetting his speech at the Labour Party conference, all because he wanted to show off that he could walk and talk at the same time.......
I think seven is enough to embarrass someone, I Just wanted a gentle reminder that, yes now he is in control of his own Twitter account he is a lot wittier, however he was still a disaster.
Although, he isn't a patch on Jeremy Corbyn who is a delight to watch! Sadly though, political satire comedians all around the country are being done out of a job!
No, not amongst Corbynista's, but for the so called "moderates", it's like they've almost forgotten just how pathetic he was.
So let's start by reminding ourselves just how and why he was unelected.
1. Ironically the EU referendum. Miliband did not want to give the people a choice, or a say in their own future.
2. Energy Freezing, only for the prices to fall soon after this policy was announced
3. Giving 2p to homeless woman he walked past.
4. When asked in an interview if he knew the average amount one family spends on food per week "£70-£80 a week." Oh dear....
5. Not knowing who rather important people within the Labour party were "You do know who Jim Grant is?"
EM "Well you'll enlightenment me I am sure."
Int "Swindon Labour leader."
6. How many inquiries did he want again? Independent, public, judge led.
7. Forgetting his speech at the Labour Party conference, all because he wanted to show off that he could walk and talk at the same time.......
I think seven is enough to embarrass someone, I Just wanted a gentle reminder that, yes now he is in control of his own Twitter account he is a lot wittier, however he was still a disaster.
Although, he isn't a patch on Jeremy Corbyn who is a delight to watch! Sadly though, political satire comedians all around the country are being done out of a job!
Tuesday, 21 March 2017
Martin McGuinness
Martin McGuinness, the former Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland, and ex cheif of the IRA has died.
As a Protestant Irish descendant I will not be mourning his death.
Yes at the end he did help create peace in Northern Ireland, but if it wasn't for people like him, the Good Friday agreement would never have been needed in the first place.
Whether you admit it or not, the man is a murderer, he has blood on his hands, and I am not just talking about British deaths, I am talking about Irish deaths.
People seem to forget that many Catholic's were killed if they were believed to have been helping the British.
McGuinness was a terrorist to some, and a freedom fighter for others, I agree with the former description.
People died needlessly, and all for what?
I am sorry for his family's loss, but at a time like this, I am also remembering those who he maimed and killed for nothing.
As a Protestant Irish descendant I will not be mourning his death.
Yes at the end he did help create peace in Northern Ireland, but if it wasn't for people like him, the Good Friday agreement would never have been needed in the first place.
Whether you admit it or not, the man is a murderer, he has blood on his hands, and I am not just talking about British deaths, I am talking about Irish deaths.
People seem to forget that many Catholic's were killed if they were believed to have been helping the British.
McGuinness was a terrorist to some, and a freedom fighter for others, I agree with the former description.
People died needlessly, and all for what?
I am sorry for his family's loss, but at a time like this, I am also remembering those who he maimed and killed for nothing.
Monday, 6 March 2017
10 Issues Corbyn Only Has To Blame Himself For
I thought I'd do a quick blog on why you can't blame the Mainstream Media, or Tony Blair, or even the "moderate" MP's who tried to overthrow Corbyn, for all the bad views the general public have on him.
1. Most recently (yesterday), Jeremy Corbyn Published his tax return. Brilliant..... Well it would have been had he actually declared all of his earnings that year. It was missing teh £40K salary he earns as Labour leader. You have to remember no one asked to see it, this is what's called an "own goal."
2. "Mao's little red book." Said John McDonnell in a return speech to the then Chancellor George Osborne. That's right taking the mick out of 60 million deaths is the way forward..... Did no one in the Labour leadership team not think twice about that gag? No?
3. The Copeland by-election loss. Not only did Labour lose the seat they'd held since the 1930's, but they lost it to the Tories, a sitting government. This hasn't happened in over a century. Why did Labour lose? Well there has been a downward spiral of support for Labour in Copeland, however the final straw was most likely the Labour leaders stance on Nuclear Power that hammered in the last nail.
4. Not singing the national anthem at an event where you're honoring those who've died for our freedom. There's a time and a place to take a political stance, this was not one of them.
5. His performances at PMQ's are hardly inspiring, first relying solely on the public for questions, then missing wide open goals the Tories have very kindly left him.
6. The so called "re-branding" at the beginning of the year was, how shall I put it, a disaster! Firstly there was an NHS Crisis going on, but of course self preservation comes first, and he managed to completely f*ck it up! "We have a new policy" in the morning, by the afternoon "we have an idea for a new policy."
7. "I will unite the party!" Was won of his winning sayings during the first Labour leadership election. Since then he's had mass resignations, MP's defying his authority (sharing platforms with the Tories over the EU Ref, and voting with the government on airstrikes over Syria which included his own Shadow Foriegn Minister), and an attempted coup to over throw him as leader, which failed spectacularly
8. The EU referendum! We all know deep down Corbyn is a leaver, and Boris Johnson a remainer, however one was more convincing than the other. Leave obviously won, not because of Corbyn's lack of enthusiasm for the EU, but I am sure that didn't help matters.
9. Can anybody name me a Labour policy? One that McDonnell or others haven't contradicted the Labour leader over?
10. His past has come up to bite quite severely on the bum! His close links with the ex IRA leaders hasn't gone down well, especially when majority of those who join the British army are working class. As well as calling terrorist organisations like Hamas, and Hezbollah "friends" and inviting them to parliament for discussions, because that'll stop them killing gays, and stoning women who've been raped, to death!
So there you have it, in no particular order, 10 faults that lie solely at the feet of Jeremy Corbyn.
1. Most recently (yesterday), Jeremy Corbyn Published his tax return. Brilliant..... Well it would have been had he actually declared all of his earnings that year. It was missing teh £40K salary he earns as Labour leader. You have to remember no one asked to see it, this is what's called an "own goal."
2. "Mao's little red book." Said John McDonnell in a return speech to the then Chancellor George Osborne. That's right taking the mick out of 60 million deaths is the way forward..... Did no one in the Labour leadership team not think twice about that gag? No?
3. The Copeland by-election loss. Not only did Labour lose the seat they'd held since the 1930's, but they lost it to the Tories, a sitting government. This hasn't happened in over a century. Why did Labour lose? Well there has been a downward spiral of support for Labour in Copeland, however the final straw was most likely the Labour leaders stance on Nuclear Power that hammered in the last nail.
4. Not singing the national anthem at an event where you're honoring those who've died for our freedom. There's a time and a place to take a political stance, this was not one of them.
5. His performances at PMQ's are hardly inspiring, first relying solely on the public for questions, then missing wide open goals the Tories have very kindly left him.
6. The so called "re-branding" at the beginning of the year was, how shall I put it, a disaster! Firstly there was an NHS Crisis going on, but of course self preservation comes first, and he managed to completely f*ck it up! "We have a new policy" in the morning, by the afternoon "we have an idea for a new policy."
7. "I will unite the party!" Was won of his winning sayings during the first Labour leadership election. Since then he's had mass resignations, MP's defying his authority (sharing platforms with the Tories over the EU Ref, and voting with the government on airstrikes over Syria which included his own Shadow Foriegn Minister), and an attempted coup to over throw him as leader, which failed spectacularly
8. The EU referendum! We all know deep down Corbyn is a leaver, and Boris Johnson a remainer, however one was more convincing than the other. Leave obviously won, not because of Corbyn's lack of enthusiasm for the EU, but I am sure that didn't help matters.
9. Can anybody name me a Labour policy? One that McDonnell or others haven't contradicted the Labour leader over?
10. His past has come up to bite quite severely on the bum! His close links with the ex IRA leaders hasn't gone down well, especially when majority of those who join the British army are working class. As well as calling terrorist organisations like Hamas, and Hezbollah "friends" and inviting them to parliament for discussions, because that'll stop them killing gays, and stoning women who've been raped, to death!
So there you have it, in no particular order, 10 faults that lie solely at the feet of Jeremy Corbyn.
Friday, 3 March 2017
Dr Christian Jessen - Idiot
Paedophilia is a sick sexual preference. Paedo's are sexually attracted to children, that is their peverted sexual preference.
TV's Dr Christian Jessen thinks that paedophiles can be "reformed", at least the "low-risk" ones anyway.
Firstly, that's as bad as the far right in America claiming that homosexuality can be "cured".
No sexuality can be "cured" or "reformed", you are what you are, whether it's straight, gay, bisexual, transgender, monosexual, or even asexual.
Paedophiles are the same, except they SHOULD be locked up, even the low-risk paedo's. They're a danger to children.
What I would like to know, is what he considers a "low-risk" paedophile.
Is it someone who just watches child pornography? (Which is my opinion makes them just as guilty as the people in the video's/ pictures committing these horrific acts.
Is it someone who sits near children's parks taking pictures to masturbate over later?
Is it someone who just fantasises about sleeping with underage children?
Is it someone who messages children through chat rooms, and social media but doesn't acutally meet up with them?
Who's to say these people who aren't physically harming any children themselves, won't take a step further next time? They obviously know what they're doing is wrong, that's why they try and hide it from public view.
So how are you meant to "reform" people, who already know what they're doing is not only against the law, but morally wrong?
They can't change their sexual preference, instead it's better to lock them up, and keep them away from children at all costs.
TV's Dr Christian Jessen thinks that paedophiles can be "reformed", at least the "low-risk" ones anyway.
Firstly, that's as bad as the far right in America claiming that homosexuality can be "cured".
No sexuality can be "cured" or "reformed", you are what you are, whether it's straight, gay, bisexual, transgender, monosexual, or even asexual.
Paedophiles are the same, except they SHOULD be locked up, even the low-risk paedo's. They're a danger to children.
What I would like to know, is what he considers a "low-risk" paedophile.
Is it someone who just watches child pornography? (Which is my opinion makes them just as guilty as the people in the video's/ pictures committing these horrific acts.
Is it someone who sits near children's parks taking pictures to masturbate over later?
Is it someone who just fantasises about sleeping with underage children?
Is it someone who messages children through chat rooms, and social media but doesn't acutally meet up with them?
Who's to say these people who aren't physically harming any children themselves, won't take a step further next time? They obviously know what they're doing is wrong, that's why they try and hide it from public view.
So how are you meant to "reform" people, who already know what they're doing is not only against the law, but morally wrong?
They can't change their sexual preference, instead it's better to lock them up, and keep them away from children at all costs.
Thursday, 2 March 2017
Will Labour Still Be The Opposition Party After 2020
Even a blind would be able to see the fact that Labour, no matter who is the leader, will not win the next general election whenever it's be.
The polling average shows a 15-18% lead for Theresa May.
Jeremy Corbyn comes third in a two man race, he is below the "Don't Know" option....... how bad do you have to be when "Don't know" beats you?
In 2015 the polls got it horribly wrong, they showed a very close race between Labour and the Conservatives, when in actual fact, the Tories were well ahead, hence the first Conservative majority government since 1992.
What's to say that's not true today, that even though the Tories are steaming ahead in the polls, and they've even managed to take the Copeland seat, which has been held by later since the 1930's.
Imagine Mrs May calls an election tomorrow for six months time, what would happen to Labour? They'd be decimated, they would no longer be the opposition party, so who would take over that?
1. Liberal Democrats - no, people seem to have largely forgot who the hell they are (despite the LibDem Fight back), and not forgiven them for promising the world and failing to deliver it
2. SNP - Again no, they only care what happens in Scotland, not Britain.
3. UKIP - No one likes Paul Nuttall, and he's badly hurt himself over his Hillsborough claim, and their one issue is immigration
4. The Green Party - No, not enough votes, and not enough people know enough about them
In other words, opposition will be a rainbow of coalition, which will not help the British public, they all have their own agenda's and what they believe is the most important thing at the time, they'll never agree to attack the Tories on one thing at a time.
Jeremy Corbyn has broken Britain, not in an economical sense, but in giving us a true and decent opposition that can hold the government to account.
The biggest open goal ever to be gifted to an opposition, was at the beginning of 2017, when the NHS crisis was at it's height, what did Corbyn do? One tiny statement to the BBC where he "demanded" Theresa May to go back to parliament...... she didn't.
What was his main focus? Re-branding himself, and introducing a new policy, which in itself was a disaster, as it was a sure thing in the morning, to only an idea by the afternoon.
We have to remember though, Jeremy was not the start of this decline, it started with New Labour, which ironically was also Labour's best ever years.
Blair and Corbyn are more alike than what most people have noticed, neither will accept any responsibility for the decline, both stick their fingers in their ears whilst humming the Banana Splits theme tune.
Blair blames Corbyn, Corbyn blames Blair.
Truth is, they're both, and everyone in-between, is to blame.
Blair ignored 1 million people marching against the Iraq war, Gordon Brown called Gillian Duffy a bigot for having a concern over immigration, and Ed Miliband ignored the calls for an EU referendum.
They're all brilliant at ignoring what the people want, despite the fact that the Labour Party is meant to be the party of the people.
Under the Tories for the last seven years unemployment continues to falls, whereas every single Labour government ever has only ever see unemployment increase.
More investment from businesses under the Tories, despite the Brexit vote, whereas Labour ignored every economist who were warning them about the 2008 financial crash, and also were the party to bail out the banks.
Labour started and funded a war in the middle east over false pretences. They lied to us, they oversaw the deaths of hundreds of our armed forces, and hundreds of thousands of deaths of civilians, all for what? More instability.
Labour is it's own worst enemy because they have "principles" that say one thing, but they do something completely other.
The polling average shows a 15-18% lead for Theresa May.
Jeremy Corbyn comes third in a two man race, he is below the "Don't Know" option....... how bad do you have to be when "Don't know" beats you?
In 2015 the polls got it horribly wrong, they showed a very close race between Labour and the Conservatives, when in actual fact, the Tories were well ahead, hence the first Conservative majority government since 1992.
What's to say that's not true today, that even though the Tories are steaming ahead in the polls, and they've even managed to take the Copeland seat, which has been held by later since the 1930's.
Imagine Mrs May calls an election tomorrow for six months time, what would happen to Labour? They'd be decimated, they would no longer be the opposition party, so who would take over that?
1. Liberal Democrats - no, people seem to have largely forgot who the hell they are (despite the LibDem Fight back), and not forgiven them for promising the world and failing to deliver it
2. SNP - Again no, they only care what happens in Scotland, not Britain.
3. UKIP - No one likes Paul Nuttall, and he's badly hurt himself over his Hillsborough claim, and their one issue is immigration
4. The Green Party - No, not enough votes, and not enough people know enough about them
In other words, opposition will be a rainbow of coalition, which will not help the British public, they all have their own agenda's and what they believe is the most important thing at the time, they'll never agree to attack the Tories on one thing at a time.
Jeremy Corbyn has broken Britain, not in an economical sense, but in giving us a true and decent opposition that can hold the government to account.
The biggest open goal ever to be gifted to an opposition, was at the beginning of 2017, when the NHS crisis was at it's height, what did Corbyn do? One tiny statement to the BBC where he "demanded" Theresa May to go back to parliament...... she didn't.
What was his main focus? Re-branding himself, and introducing a new policy, which in itself was a disaster, as it was a sure thing in the morning, to only an idea by the afternoon.
We have to remember though, Jeremy was not the start of this decline, it started with New Labour, which ironically was also Labour's best ever years.
Blair and Corbyn are more alike than what most people have noticed, neither will accept any responsibility for the decline, both stick their fingers in their ears whilst humming the Banana Splits theme tune.
Blair blames Corbyn, Corbyn blames Blair.
Truth is, they're both, and everyone in-between, is to blame.
Blair ignored 1 million people marching against the Iraq war, Gordon Brown called Gillian Duffy a bigot for having a concern over immigration, and Ed Miliband ignored the calls for an EU referendum.
They're all brilliant at ignoring what the people want, despite the fact that the Labour Party is meant to be the party of the people.
Under the Tories for the last seven years unemployment continues to falls, whereas every single Labour government ever has only ever see unemployment increase.
More investment from businesses under the Tories, despite the Brexit vote, whereas Labour ignored every economist who were warning them about the 2008 financial crash, and also were the party to bail out the banks.
Labour started and funded a war in the middle east over false pretences. They lied to us, they oversaw the deaths of hundreds of our armed forces, and hundreds of thousands of deaths of civilians, all for what? More instability.
Labour is it's own worst enemy because they have "principles" that say one thing, but they do something completely other.
Monday, 27 February 2017
You're Not Back Benchers Anymore!
There's one major problem with Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, they still think they're bank benchers.
Today it was released online an article or warning about a "soft coup" from some Labour MP's and the "Murdoch empire." This was from the words of John McDonnell.
The problem here is, these two, now very important men, forget they're not back benchers anymore, anything they write, no matter how small the following of that particular blog/ magazine/ newspaper will be picked up and read.
Your profiles have gone from MP's only a few people had heard of, to potentially being the Prime Minister and Chancellor.
Jeremy Corbyn made quite a funny blunder at the Scottish Labour Party conference, accidentally praising the SNP instead of Labour MSP's.
Immediately you could see the annoyance on Corbyn's face, then during a Sky News interview he looked ever so slightly crazy in answering whether he will still be Labour leader in 2020.
Ironically like Blair, they're stuck in the past, they're used to being the underdog, having no or little responsibility, the seats they represent would vote a chicken in if it was wearing a Labour rosette, so they're used to being part of the background, not much detail to them.
In seven months time, they'd have been at the helm of Labour for two years, it's time they had gotten used to the pressure of every little thing they say and do being analysed, and so it should be too.
These two people could be (however I greatly doubt it), the new Cameron & Osborne, or Blair & Brown double act leading the country, Corbyn & McDonnell.
If they can't handle the pressure as it is now, how on earth do they think they could deal with it if they ever won a general election? Not only the press but every country in the world will have their eyes on your every move, and word.
You would be responsible for 60 million people, you will responsible for millions of jobs, the state of the currency, the NHS, the police, the fire brigade, our Armed Forces, our defence strategy, foreign affairs.
If you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen!
Today it was released online an article or warning about a "soft coup" from some Labour MP's and the "Murdoch empire." This was from the words of John McDonnell.
The problem here is, these two, now very important men, forget they're not back benchers anymore, anything they write, no matter how small the following of that particular blog/ magazine/ newspaper will be picked up and read.
Your profiles have gone from MP's only a few people had heard of, to potentially being the Prime Minister and Chancellor.
Jeremy Corbyn made quite a funny blunder at the Scottish Labour Party conference, accidentally praising the SNP instead of Labour MSP's.
Immediately you could see the annoyance on Corbyn's face, then during a Sky News interview he looked ever so slightly crazy in answering whether he will still be Labour leader in 2020.
Ironically like Blair, they're stuck in the past, they're used to being the underdog, having no or little responsibility, the seats they represent would vote a chicken in if it was wearing a Labour rosette, so they're used to being part of the background, not much detail to them.
In seven months time, they'd have been at the helm of Labour for two years, it's time they had gotten used to the pressure of every little thing they say and do being analysed, and so it should be too.
These two people could be (however I greatly doubt it), the new Cameron & Osborne, or Blair & Brown double act leading the country, Corbyn & McDonnell.
If they can't handle the pressure as it is now, how on earth do they think they could deal with it if they ever won a general election? Not only the press but every country in the world will have their eyes on your every move, and word.
You would be responsible for 60 million people, you will responsible for millions of jobs, the state of the currency, the NHS, the police, the fire brigade, our Armed Forces, our defence strategy, foreign affairs.
If you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen!
Friday, 24 February 2017
Copeland & Stoke
Jeremy Corbyn is lucky, his party on the other hand, extremely unlucky.
Labour lost to the Tories in Copeland (a seat that Labour had kept since the 1930's, and first time since Thatcher that a sitting government wins a seat from the opposition), but narrowly kept Stoke.
UKIP are now a laughing stoke, and Paul Nuttall is finished, there's no point dwelling on them anymore.
Labour on the other hand are now going to keep Jeremy Corbyn as their leader, good for him, bad for the party.
Why is it bad? Well he has no direction of where his leadership wants to go, he isn't interested in listening to other views (hence McDonnell's blame of Blair), and people just don't have the faith in him.
Ironically McDonnell blaming Blair for the loss of Copeland, is just as laughable as Blair blaming Corbyn for the Brexit vote.
There's one other reason why Labour lost Copeland, they took that safe seat for granted, the didn't think a seat they had always held would leave them for the Tories, they were wrong, and have been rightly punished.
The next general election will see Theresa May win fantastically, Labour lose sorely, and the country will be without a true opposition to hold the government to account.
The longer Corbyn stays as leader, the longer it'll take to regain a lot of lost constituencies.
Labour lost to the Tories in Copeland (a seat that Labour had kept since the 1930's, and first time since Thatcher that a sitting government wins a seat from the opposition), but narrowly kept Stoke.
UKIP are now a laughing stoke, and Paul Nuttall is finished, there's no point dwelling on them anymore.
Labour on the other hand are now going to keep Jeremy Corbyn as their leader, good for him, bad for the party.
Why is it bad? Well he has no direction of where his leadership wants to go, he isn't interested in listening to other views (hence McDonnell's blame of Blair), and people just don't have the faith in him.
Ironically McDonnell blaming Blair for the loss of Copeland, is just as laughable as Blair blaming Corbyn for the Brexit vote.
There's one other reason why Labour lost Copeland, they took that safe seat for granted, the didn't think a seat they had always held would leave them for the Tories, they were wrong, and have been rightly punished.
The next general election will see Theresa May win fantastically, Labour lose sorely, and the country will be without a true opposition to hold the government to account.
The longer Corbyn stays as leader, the longer it'll take to regain a lot of lost constituencies.
Monday, 20 February 2017
"To Incompetency And Beyond!"
The latest ICM/ Guardian poll has put Tories 18 points ahead of Labour:
Con 44%, Lab 26%, UKIP 13%, LDem 8%, Green 4%, SNP 4%, PC*%, Other 1%
What's weird is how the Tories have little to no ammo, there is an NHS Crisis, whether Tories want to admit that or not, Brexit could be seen as a shambles (until Remain spun out Blair and Mandelson), and May's cosying up to Trump has less than impressed Britain.
How bad of a leader do you have to be, that when you're in opposition and you can't beat the government in the polls on one issue.
According to the ComRes/ Mirror poll 43% of the public are "More like to trust Ma and the Tories" than Jeremy Corbyn and Labour regarding the NHS.
The NHS is supposed to be Labour's safe house, their home territory, after all it was a Labour government who introduced and started the NHS.
May also wins in every poll on whether the public prefer her or Corbyn to be Prime Minister, in fact she also trump's (no pun intended... honest) Nichola Sturgeon in Scottish polls on preferred leaders.
Jeremy Corbyn's problem? Himself, he is his and Labour's, own worst enemy.
Is he a nice guy? I am sure he is, but in the world of politics, nice just doesn't cut it.
You need someone who's got a backbone, not afraid to stand up for us, and do what they believe is best for the country.
May is a hard woman, she doesn't suffer fools gladly. Methodical, reasoned, well informed.
Corbyn is a nice man, most likely a weak hand shake, and has no leadership qualities.
Neither are good orators, but May is slightly better.
Things just get worse and worse for Corbyn, until he leaves, and as much as I am enjoying watching him destroy Labour, he is denying the country of a credible opposition, of holding the government to account.
Con 44%, Lab 26%, UKIP 13%, LDem 8%, Green 4%, SNP 4%, PC*%, Other 1%
What's weird is how the Tories have little to no ammo, there is an NHS Crisis, whether Tories want to admit that or not, Brexit could be seen as a shambles (until Remain spun out Blair and Mandelson), and May's cosying up to Trump has less than impressed Britain.
How bad of a leader do you have to be, that when you're in opposition and you can't beat the government in the polls on one issue.
According to the ComRes/ Mirror poll 43% of the public are "More like to trust Ma and the Tories" than Jeremy Corbyn and Labour regarding the NHS.
The NHS is supposed to be Labour's safe house, their home territory, after all it was a Labour government who introduced and started the NHS.
May also wins in every poll on whether the public prefer her or Corbyn to be Prime Minister, in fact she also trump's (no pun intended... honest) Nichola Sturgeon in Scottish polls on preferred leaders.
Jeremy Corbyn's problem? Himself, he is his and Labour's, own worst enemy.
Is he a nice guy? I am sure he is, but in the world of politics, nice just doesn't cut it.
You need someone who's got a backbone, not afraid to stand up for us, and do what they believe is best for the country.
May is a hard woman, she doesn't suffer fools gladly. Methodical, reasoned, well informed.
Corbyn is a nice man, most likely a weak hand shake, and has no leadership qualities.
Neither are good orators, but May is slightly better.
Things just get worse and worse for Corbyn, until he leaves, and as much as I am enjoying watching him destroy Labour, he is denying the country of a credible opposition, of holding the government to account.
Friday, 17 February 2017
Tony Blair: The Smiling Assassin
Tony Blair, the smiling assassin has raised his ugly head once more.
Not sure if Mr Blair is aware (rhyme not intended), but Leave received 51.9% of the vote, which is roughly 17 million voters.
Blair's most successful general election result in 1997 saw him receive 43.2% of the vote, which is roughly 13 million votes, good enough mandate for him to govern.
He wants Remain voters to "rise up against" Brexit, because those of us who voted to leave the EU were ill informed, basically he thinks we're thick.
He doesn't understand the many reason why people want Britain to leave the Eu, so I'll help him out.
1. Accountability of our politicians
This one reason encompasses everything from immigration levels, to what laws we have, to who we want to do Trade Deals with.
Who was accountable for what happens in the EU? Who are the people we should be having a go at about the open borders? Is Merkel? Juncker? Or the unelected bureaucrats who no one knows the names of?
The problem I find with Blair is, it feels like he's stuck in 1997, D-Ream's "Things Can Only Get Better" on a loop, whilst he constantly repeats the word "Education" over and over, whilst smiling like the Joker out of Batman.
If I were a Remain voter and Tony Blair backing my cause, I would start to rethink my choices.
Not sure if Mr Blair is aware (rhyme not intended), but Leave received 51.9% of the vote, which is roughly 17 million voters.
Blair's most successful general election result in 1997 saw him receive 43.2% of the vote, which is roughly 13 million votes, good enough mandate for him to govern.
He wants Remain voters to "rise up against" Brexit, because those of us who voted to leave the EU were ill informed, basically he thinks we're thick.
He doesn't understand the many reason why people want Britain to leave the Eu, so I'll help him out.
1. Accountability of our politicians
This one reason encompasses everything from immigration levels, to what laws we have, to who we want to do Trade Deals with.
Who was accountable for what happens in the EU? Who are the people we should be having a go at about the open borders? Is Merkel? Juncker? Or the unelected bureaucrats who no one knows the names of?
The problem I find with Blair is, it feels like he's stuck in 1997, D-Ream's "Things Can Only Get Better" on a loop, whilst he constantly repeats the word "Education" over and over, whilst smiling like the Joker out of Batman.
If I were a Remain voter and Tony Blair backing my cause, I would start to rethink my choices.
Tuesday, 14 February 2017
Moorside
Before BBC made Moorside my feelings towards Karen Matthews were not pleasant.
I felt no sorrow for her, I felt she should have locked up and never forgiven.
However, I now do have different opinions.
Am I angry at her? Yes!
Can I believe what she did? No!
Is it up to me or you to forgive her? Absolutely not.
The people that decide whether they forgive her are her family, friends, the community that got behind her, and of course her daughter Shannon.
Was Karen Matthews to blame? Yes!
Did she know when to stop? Possibly not.
We all know she's never really made great choices in her life, pretending that her daughter had been abducted was her worst decision of all.
Was Karen Matthews abused? By lots of people, and I do believe she was, and possibly still is, a weak willed person, probably every man she ever went with abused her in one way or another, she'd probably never made a decision for herself before.
I honestly believe that Mick Donovan probably was the brains behind it, not Karen, and being as weak as she is, Karen probably thought it would be OK.
Now some people might come back at me and say "other people have been abused and don't do this type of thing.'
You're right, but then again, some people who've had perfectly good lives go on to do worse things that what Karen did.
Peter Sutcliffe (The Yorkshire Ripper), Christopher Foster (killed his wife, daughter and their horses because of bankruptcy), Myra Hindley (took children off the streets so her lover Ian Brady could rape and kill them).
None of these people were "abused", none of them had, at least before, witnessed such horror, they look(ed) like ordinary people, you'd never have put them down as murderers, but they all are, mass murderers.
Do we forget about this case? No! Always learn from history, it could always happen again, and could have a lot worse outcome.
I hope Shannon and her siblings are happy, I hope they're living happy lives, getting to do things every normal teenager, and young person should be able to do.
Should people attack Karen Matthews? No, because you're lowering yourself to level she stooped to back in 2008.
If there is one thing this programme shows us, its that there are segments of people in our country and communities that are not helped, that are ignored, where doing something as diabolical as this seems like the only option left.
Things need to change, help needs to come, to prevent this from ever happening again.
I felt no sorrow for her, I felt she should have locked up and never forgiven.
However, I now do have different opinions.
Am I angry at her? Yes!
Can I believe what she did? No!
Is it up to me or you to forgive her? Absolutely not.
The people that decide whether they forgive her are her family, friends, the community that got behind her, and of course her daughter Shannon.
Was Karen Matthews to blame? Yes!
Did she know when to stop? Possibly not.
We all know she's never really made great choices in her life, pretending that her daughter had been abducted was her worst decision of all.
Was Karen Matthews abused? By lots of people, and I do believe she was, and possibly still is, a weak willed person, probably every man she ever went with abused her in one way or another, she'd probably never made a decision for herself before.
I honestly believe that Mick Donovan probably was the brains behind it, not Karen, and being as weak as she is, Karen probably thought it would be OK.
Now some people might come back at me and say "other people have been abused and don't do this type of thing.'
You're right, but then again, some people who've had perfectly good lives go on to do worse things that what Karen did.
Peter Sutcliffe (The Yorkshire Ripper), Christopher Foster (killed his wife, daughter and their horses because of bankruptcy), Myra Hindley (took children off the streets so her lover Ian Brady could rape and kill them).
None of these people were "abused", none of them had, at least before, witnessed such horror, they look(ed) like ordinary people, you'd never have put them down as murderers, but they all are, mass murderers.
Do we forget about this case? No! Always learn from history, it could always happen again, and could have a lot worse outcome.
I hope Shannon and her siblings are happy, I hope they're living happy lives, getting to do things every normal teenager, and young person should be able to do.
Should people attack Karen Matthews? No, because you're lowering yourself to level she stooped to back in 2008.
If there is one thing this programme shows us, its that there are segments of people in our country and communities that are not helped, that are ignored, where doing something as diabolical as this seems like the only option left.
Things need to change, help needs to come, to prevent this from ever happening again.
Monday, 6 February 2017
Bercow the Trump Banner!
Speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow has banned President Trump for giving a speech in the Houses of Parliament.
Why? Well he disagrees with his sexist, racist stance. Fair enough!
But where, I ask, was his objection the the Emir of Kuwait, or the President of China?
Kuwait is a country that has banned Israli's, and imprisons homosexuals, as well as being a dictatorship.
China has no human rights whatsoever. If you were to speak out against the President you could be arrested.
China also gave the people of Hong Kong their leader, a leader they never wanted and called the people of Hong Kong to be more like "sheep".
In fact the Chinese President has called Human Rights lawyers in China a "criminal gang".
So all I am asking from our so called impartial speaker, is to be consistent.
If you'll ban Trump because of his ban, why didn't you ban the Emir of Kuwait for their ban? Why didn't you ban the Chinese President for his ban on human rights?
Don't pick and choose, don't try and be cool, be consistent with you opinions, then twits like me can't show you up.
Why? Well he disagrees with his sexist, racist stance. Fair enough!
But where, I ask, was his objection the the Emir of Kuwait, or the President of China?
Kuwait is a country that has banned Israli's, and imprisons homosexuals, as well as being a dictatorship.
China has no human rights whatsoever. If you were to speak out against the President you could be arrested.
China also gave the people of Hong Kong their leader, a leader they never wanted and called the people of Hong Kong to be more like "sheep".
In fact the Chinese President has called Human Rights lawyers in China a "criminal gang".
So all I am asking from our so called impartial speaker, is to be consistent.
If you'll ban Trump because of his ban, why didn't you ban the Emir of Kuwait for their ban? Why didn't you ban the Chinese President for his ban on human rights?
Don't pick and choose, don't try and be cool, be consistent with you opinions, then twits like me can't show you up.
Sunday, 5 February 2017
What Options Does Labour Have?
Labour is currently the largest party in Britain (membership wise), with over half a million members since Jeremy Corbyn's victory to be come leader in September 2015.
Yet they are trailing badly in the polls, according to @britainelects in their "Poll of polls":
Con: 40.1%
Labour: 28.5%
UKIP: 11.9%
LDem: 9.6%
Grn: 3.6%
Other: 6.3%
Labour are behind 11.6% the Tories, if you didn't know much about British politics you would be forgiven for thinking that it was the Tories in opposition and Labour in power, not the way it is currently.
Normally being in opposition gives an advantage as you can slaughter the government, and god knows Labour's had plenty of opportunities to do so, the NHS and Donald Trump are just two of them.
Yet for some reason Corbyn has failed to do what the opposition is meant to do, bring the government to account.
Instead they've left it to you and me to do so, people are taking it upon themselves to march against Trump's future State visit, and leaving it up to Doctors and Nurses to be the ones who go on radio and explain the difficulties they are currently going through.
So what are Labour's options?
Well, Jeremy Corbyn could try and grow a backbone, but as we all know he's had 18 months to do so and is still meek and mild.
They could try and do another coup and elect a new leader, which as we saw last time was a complete and utter failure.
Or they could wait for the 2020 general election (which by all leading polls they'll lose spectacularly), and then elect a new leader, who will most probably bring them back to New Labour's ground, which people have still not forgiven or forgotten.
Or they could split, which again isn't a great option.
In my humble opinion, they are f*cked beyond all hope.
Yet they are trailing badly in the polls, according to @britainelects in their "Poll of polls":
Con: 40.1%
Labour: 28.5%
UKIP: 11.9%
LDem: 9.6%
Grn: 3.6%
Other: 6.3%
Labour are behind 11.6% the Tories, if you didn't know much about British politics you would be forgiven for thinking that it was the Tories in opposition and Labour in power, not the way it is currently.
Normally being in opposition gives an advantage as you can slaughter the government, and god knows Labour's had plenty of opportunities to do so, the NHS and Donald Trump are just two of them.
Yet for some reason Corbyn has failed to do what the opposition is meant to do, bring the government to account.
Instead they've left it to you and me to do so, people are taking it upon themselves to march against Trump's future State visit, and leaving it up to Doctors and Nurses to be the ones who go on radio and explain the difficulties they are currently going through.
So what are Labour's options?
Well, Jeremy Corbyn could try and grow a backbone, but as we all know he's had 18 months to do so and is still meek and mild.
They could try and do another coup and elect a new leader, which as we saw last time was a complete and utter failure.
Or they could wait for the 2020 general election (which by all leading polls they'll lose spectacularly), and then elect a new leader, who will most probably bring them back to New Labour's ground, which people have still not forgiven or forgotten.
Or they could split, which again isn't a great option.
In my humble opinion, they are f*cked beyond all hope.
Wednesday, 1 February 2017
Can The Last Member Of Labour Switch Off The Lights
What a performance from Jeremy Corbyn, I've never seen one person miss so many opportunities to score at an open goal.
Ed Miliband was pretty decent at missing an open goal, but Corbyn is the master.
Trump was a subject that should have trumped Theresa May, instead she lay in camouflage, totally prepared for the, what should have been, "onslaught" from Corbyn.
Instead, Mr Bean turned up, his meak and mild ways asking questions May kept batting away, much to the shock and horror of the Labour back benches.
May answered the questions better than what Corbyn could ask them, and with her final line to her opposition number "He can lead a protest, I am leading a country." The Labour back benches couldn't hide how "glum" they were after their leaders rather feeble performance.
Corbyn's performance summed up below:
Nobody seems to actually care what Angus Robertson had to say, and Tim Farron was not only laughed out by the Tories, but Labour as well.
There is no real opposition at the moment, yes people might not like the way May deals with issues, however polls do suggest she has more trust that what Corbyn could ever hope to have.
May has even polled higher than Nichola Sturgeon in Scotland!
Currently the YouGov poll shows that Tories leader by 16%:
Conservative: 40%, Labour: 24%, Lib Dems: 10%, UKIP: 14%, Other: 11%,
(Note how other is also beating the Lib Dems).
Another poll in favour of Mrs May is who would be best Prime Minister:
May: 47%
Corbyn: 15%
Don't Know: 38%
Corbyn is still third place in a two horse race, what a feat!
Just to add insult to injury, despite over 1 million people signing a petition to try and stop Trump from making a State Visit to the UK, and thousands of people marching on Sunday night:
49% of people think it should go ahead, whilst only 36% think it shoul not go ahead.
Old Owen Jones finds himself, and his celebrity mates, on the outside of public opinion once again.
Now I am not a fan of Trump, I feel sorry that our Queen has to entertain the overgrown tangerine, but none the less it is happening, whether it's now or 2 years down the line.
Ed Miliband was pretty decent at missing an open goal, but Corbyn is the master.
Trump was a subject that should have trumped Theresa May, instead she lay in camouflage, totally prepared for the, what should have been, "onslaught" from Corbyn.
Instead, Mr Bean turned up, his meak and mild ways asking questions May kept batting away, much to the shock and horror of the Labour back benches.
May answered the questions better than what Corbyn could ask them, and with her final line to her opposition number "He can lead a protest, I am leading a country." The Labour back benches couldn't hide how "glum" they were after their leaders rather feeble performance.
Corbyn's performance summed up below:
Nobody seems to actually care what Angus Robertson had to say, and Tim Farron was not only laughed out by the Tories, but Labour as well.
There is no real opposition at the moment, yes people might not like the way May deals with issues, however polls do suggest she has more trust that what Corbyn could ever hope to have.
May has even polled higher than Nichola Sturgeon in Scotland!
Currently the YouGov poll shows that Tories leader by 16%:
Conservative: 40%, Labour: 24%, Lib Dems: 10%, UKIP: 14%, Other: 11%,
(Note how other is also beating the Lib Dems).
Another poll in favour of Mrs May is who would be best Prime Minister:
May: 47%
Corbyn: 15%
Don't Know: 38%
Corbyn is still third place in a two horse race, what a feat!
Just to add insult to injury, despite over 1 million people signing a petition to try and stop Trump from making a State Visit to the UK, and thousands of people marching on Sunday night:
49% of people think it should go ahead, whilst only 36% think it shoul not go ahead.
Old Owen Jones finds himself, and his celebrity mates, on the outside of public opinion once again.
Now I am not a fan of Trump, I feel sorry that our Queen has to entertain the overgrown tangerine, but none the less it is happening, whether it's now or 2 years down the line.
Monday, 30 January 2017
Muslim Ban
Let's be honest, Trump is a twunt, sadly a rich and extremely powerful one.
I am no fan of Trump, I don't our Queen to have to go through the laborious chore of having to entertain the toupee'd tangerine.
Let's get a few things straight, Theresa May is no appeaser, she has a duty to make sure we have good trade deals following the Brexit vote.
Secondly they didn't "hold hands" lovingly, he helped her down a few steps, to be honest it was nice seeing him help a woman for a change.
Thirdly, she should not resign, and asking her to is beyond boringly pathetic, and people like Owen Jones can do one.
However this Muslim ban on certain countries where Trump doesn't have any monetary gains, is also beyond boringly pathetic.
It won't solve anything, it will just create a further divide between the West, especially the US, and the Middle East.
Groups like ISIS, Hamas and Boko Haram will have something to prove about the West's hate for them, their ranks will grow again, their anger will increase, and so will the attacks.
Perhaps not in the US (as they're banned), but poor France will be victimised again, or here, or Germany, or any other European city.
What Trump has done is to put us all at risk with this ban.
So I will end off with say cheers Trump for increasing danger, and to anyone to thinks May is appeasing him...... you're as bad as him.
I am no fan of Trump, I don't our Queen to have to go through the laborious chore of having to entertain the toupee'd tangerine.
Let's get a few things straight, Theresa May is no appeaser, she has a duty to make sure we have good trade deals following the Brexit vote.
Secondly they didn't "hold hands" lovingly, he helped her down a few steps, to be honest it was nice seeing him help a woman for a change.
Thirdly, she should not resign, and asking her to is beyond boringly pathetic, and people like Owen Jones can do one.
However this Muslim ban on certain countries where Trump doesn't have any monetary gains, is also beyond boringly pathetic.
It won't solve anything, it will just create a further divide between the West, especially the US, and the Middle East.
Groups like ISIS, Hamas and Boko Haram will have something to prove about the West's hate for them, their ranks will grow again, their anger will increase, and so will the attacks.
Perhaps not in the US (as they're banned), but poor France will be victimised again, or here, or Germany, or any other European city.
What Trump has done is to put us all at risk with this ban.
So I will end off with say cheers Trump for increasing danger, and to anyone to thinks May is appeasing him...... you're as bad as him.
Thursday, 26 January 2017
Trump Needs A Thump
I may be a Tory but I am no Trump supporter.
Firstly he's a misogynist, racist, homophobic blonde bimbo (apologies to all other blonde bimbo's who are not any of these things except for dim).
I am not normally a person who gets angry by men's ignorance towards women, but what he said about his own daughter was disgusting and says a lot about the man.
For those who says he is not racist, he is, there is absolutely no need to build a "wall" to divide Mexico and the USA.
Why not make more jobs in America by making border security more efficient? And why does he hate Mexican's so much? Does he not realise America have their own drug dealers, who have absolutely nothing to do with Mexico?
For those who says he is not homophobic, again, he very much is, what was one of the first things he actioned once sworn in? He rid the White House's website of the LGBT page.
He is also a climate change denier, another action he made on the day he was sworn in was also to rid the White House's website of the climate change page.
More worryingly he now turns about to be a fan of torture, especially waterboarding..... What century are we in again?
Why on earth would anyone want to bring back any forms of torture? And before you answer, just think about the many times you slated other countries for using techniques similar to this.
Saudi Arabia? Iran? Iraq? Many African countries.
So why should America and Trump be the exception to the rule? They shouldn't be.
The only blinder Trump has played so far is to take America out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is something the left wanted, and anyone saying it was down to people power are only kidding themselves.
Trump isn't a man who particularly cares about other opinions, only his own.
So in my opinion if Trump thinks waterboarding is a good way of getting people to talk, why doesn't he offer himself up and prove to us how good it is with a demonstration?
Firstly he's a misogynist, racist, homophobic blonde bimbo (apologies to all other blonde bimbo's who are not any of these things except for dim).
I am not normally a person who gets angry by men's ignorance towards women, but what he said about his own daughter was disgusting and says a lot about the man.
For those who says he is not racist, he is, there is absolutely no need to build a "wall" to divide Mexico and the USA.
Why not make more jobs in America by making border security more efficient? And why does he hate Mexican's so much? Does he not realise America have their own drug dealers, who have absolutely nothing to do with Mexico?
For those who says he is not homophobic, again, he very much is, what was one of the first things he actioned once sworn in? He rid the White House's website of the LGBT page.
He is also a climate change denier, another action he made on the day he was sworn in was also to rid the White House's website of the climate change page.
More worryingly he now turns about to be a fan of torture, especially waterboarding..... What century are we in again?
Why on earth would anyone want to bring back any forms of torture? And before you answer, just think about the many times you slated other countries for using techniques similar to this.
Saudi Arabia? Iran? Iraq? Many African countries.
So why should America and Trump be the exception to the rule? They shouldn't be.
The only blinder Trump has played so far is to take America out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is something the left wanted, and anyone saying it was down to people power are only kidding themselves.
Trump isn't a man who particularly cares about other opinions, only his own.
So in my opinion if Trump thinks waterboarding is a good way of getting people to talk, why doesn't he offer himself up and prove to us how good it is with a demonstration?
Sunday, 22 January 2017
The Nonexistent Opposition
Ed Miliband was quite pathetic as an opposition leader, however on the odd occasion he did manage to upset the Tories and the coalition government.
1. Air strikes on Syria, he managed to win the No votes, the government lost.
2. He took advantage of the Lib Dems failing to stand up for, or persuade the Tories to not up tuition fees
3. He managed to get Labour beating the Tories in the polls.
Whereas Jeremy Corbyn has never been ahead of the Tories in the polls, lost the vote to not have air strikes over Syria, and is unable to take advantage of when the government is going through a rough period, such as when he failed to slam the Tories on the NHS crisis.
The NHS was in a crisis situation, what did Jez and his media team (lead by his ever faithful friend Seumas Milne), decided to promote........ Labour's new policy on capping how much you can earn.
The only time he mentioned the NHS was when prompted by a journalist, and the only time he put any sort of "pressure" on the government was in a single statement calling for Theresa May to go back to parliament, naturally she ignored his statement and carried on as normal.
Not only did Jeremy fail to put pressure on the government when they were at their weakest, he had an awful time explaining his new policy.
In the morning it was made in stone (not Ed's), the afternoon it was just an idea.
But the badness doesn't stop there, Diane Abbott today went on The Marr Show on BBC 1, and when asked about how Labour will whip Article 50, her answer "I cannot tell you".
Few weeks ago Tom Watson, Labour's deputy leader, told another journalist that it was "unfair to ask" him on what Labour's stance was on Brexit.
Again the pain doesn't stop there, not so long ago "moderate" Labour MP Tristram Hunt quit as a Labour MP which has forced a by election, this has given UKIP's newly elected leader, Paul Nuttall, an opportunity to stand, and it looks more promising for him than the new Labour candidate.
As well as Corbyn's checkered history as Labour leader, for his Shadow Chancellor deciding to use Chairman Mao's "little red book" as a gag at the Tories which immensely back fired.
Or his closeness with the IRA and it's ex leader Gerry Adams.
Or his PLP meeting as leader, which resulted in one MP telling the papers it was a "fucking shambles", and Jess Philip's telling Diane Abbott to "Fuck off."
Jeremy is not a leader, and in staying in as the leader of the opposition he is denying the country of one majorly important thing; bring the government to account.
1. Air strikes on Syria, he managed to win the No votes, the government lost.
2. He took advantage of the Lib Dems failing to stand up for, or persuade the Tories to not up tuition fees
3. He managed to get Labour beating the Tories in the polls.
Whereas Jeremy Corbyn has never been ahead of the Tories in the polls, lost the vote to not have air strikes over Syria, and is unable to take advantage of when the government is going through a rough period, such as when he failed to slam the Tories on the NHS crisis.
The NHS was in a crisis situation, what did Jez and his media team (lead by his ever faithful friend Seumas Milne), decided to promote........ Labour's new policy on capping how much you can earn.
The only time he mentioned the NHS was when prompted by a journalist, and the only time he put any sort of "pressure" on the government was in a single statement calling for Theresa May to go back to parliament, naturally she ignored his statement and carried on as normal.
Not only did Jeremy fail to put pressure on the government when they were at their weakest, he had an awful time explaining his new policy.
In the morning it was made in stone (not Ed's), the afternoon it was just an idea.
But the badness doesn't stop there, Diane Abbott today went on The Marr Show on BBC 1, and when asked about how Labour will whip Article 50, her answer "I cannot tell you".
Few weeks ago Tom Watson, Labour's deputy leader, told another journalist that it was "unfair to ask" him on what Labour's stance was on Brexit.
Again the pain doesn't stop there, not so long ago "moderate" Labour MP Tristram Hunt quit as a Labour MP which has forced a by election, this has given UKIP's newly elected leader, Paul Nuttall, an opportunity to stand, and it looks more promising for him than the new Labour candidate.
As well as Corbyn's checkered history as Labour leader, for his Shadow Chancellor deciding to use Chairman Mao's "little red book" as a gag at the Tories which immensely back fired.
Or his closeness with the IRA and it's ex leader Gerry Adams.
Or his PLP meeting as leader, which resulted in one MP telling the papers it was a "fucking shambles", and Jess Philip's telling Diane Abbott to "Fuck off."
Jeremy is not a leader, and in staying in as the leader of the opposition he is denying the country of one majorly important thing; bring the government to account.
Tuesday, 17 January 2017
Why #Brexit is Good!
Brexit is a good thing, why? When we leave the EU our politicians will be wholly accountable, there will not be other countries denying us, and we will not be denying them.
We will be able to control our own borders, therefore be able to get our housing, NHS, and schooling systems sorted out.
How is it fair to keep open borders when the basic needs, housing, education and health, are struggling?
How is fair on those seeking for a better life and are promised a better life are moved into squalor? Put on waiting lists? Squeezed into a room to share between five or more people?
How is it fair on the people already on waiting lists to be kept waiting even further because successive governments have failed to accommodate the influx of immigration?
How is fair to allow an unelected, unnamed person to decide what can and can't happen?
How is it fair that some of these EU rules and regulations are good for some countries and not for others?
Where is the fairness in the EU? Where is the common sense to have unelected bureaucrats, who most people can't name off of hand, tell countries what they can and can't do?
Surely holding those we have elected to account is the proper and correct way to go about things?
We will be able to control our own borders, therefore be able to get our housing, NHS, and schooling systems sorted out.
How is it fair to keep open borders when the basic needs, housing, education and health, are struggling?
How is fair on those seeking for a better life and are promised a better life are moved into squalor? Put on waiting lists? Squeezed into a room to share between five or more people?
How is it fair on the people already on waiting lists to be kept waiting even further because successive governments have failed to accommodate the influx of immigration?
How is fair to allow an unelected, unnamed person to decide what can and can't happen?
How is it fair that some of these EU rules and regulations are good for some countries and not for others?
Where is the fairness in the EU? Where is the common sense to have unelected bureaucrats, who most people can't name off of hand, tell countries what they can and can't do?
Surely holding those we have elected to account is the proper and correct way to go about things?
Tuesday, 10 January 2017
The "New" Corbyn? Worse Than Ever Before!
Corbyn and his team obviously decided to take on board the slogan "New year, new me", and decided to "relaunch the Labour leader and the party.
Firstly by not being seen at all, when there has been ample opportunity to kick the Tories where it would really hurt, instead Mr Corbyn decided it was far more important that he have a holiday.
At the moment the NHS is being so badly run the NHS has been called in for help, now if you were a Labour leader, wouldn't you be running from news station to news station shouting about how appalling this is?
Not Corbyn, he issued a single statement. I bet Theresa May and Jeremy Hunt sh*t themselves when they heard he had!
Since then, Corbyn has come out of the shadows, and this morning has decided to go from news station to news station talking about...... his new policy of putting a cap on how much you can earn.
That's right, he isn't here to hold the government to account, as every other opposition leader has done in the past, but to promote a new Labour policy.
Good to see he has his finger on the pulse.
I am not sure what planet Corbyn and his team are on, but it's certainly not earth!
Saturday, 7 January 2017
Rich and dumb
A Tory donor has claimed he won't be one any longer if Theresa May takes us out of the Single Market.
Now I have no qualms with rich people, in fact I would rather like to become one!
However, I do take a problem when they think they and their money is far more important than the will of the people. 17 million people to be more precise.
It's people like this Tory donor (I haven't bothered to learn his name) who give Tories, like me, a bad name. This donor is the stereotypical Tory, so stereotypical in fact that he would give fictional character Alan B'Stard a run for his money!
By all means be a donor to whatever party you see fit, but don't try and out do the will of the British people, firstly it makes you look like a pompous, self-centred, arsehole that he most likely probably is.
If you don't want to be part of a party because they're listening to the will of the people, then don't broadcast it, not only do you lose any sympathy people who voted to remain might have had, you become public enemy number one, and there are enough politicians to take that place without you joining them.
Now I have no qualms with rich people, in fact I would rather like to become one!
However, I do take a problem when they think they and their money is far more important than the will of the people. 17 million people to be more precise.
It's people like this Tory donor (I haven't bothered to learn his name) who give Tories, like me, a bad name. This donor is the stereotypical Tory, so stereotypical in fact that he would give fictional character Alan B'Stard a run for his money!
By all means be a donor to whatever party you see fit, but don't try and out do the will of the British people, firstly it makes you look like a pompous, self-centred, arsehole that he most likely probably is.
If you don't want to be part of a party because they're listening to the will of the people, then don't broadcast it, not only do you lose any sympathy people who voted to remain might have had, you become public enemy number one, and there are enough politicians to take that place without you joining them.
Monday, 2 January 2017
2017 - Year of Change?
2016 was a defining year.
Of course the celebrity deaths were huge! David Bowie, Alan Rickman, Victoria Wood, Terry Wogan, Prince, Harper Lee, George Michael, Caroline Aheren, as well as many others!
Many icons sadly died last year.
Also there was huge political moments that world was witness too.
Let's start in Britain.
Well the Conservatives had a huge year, firstly David Cameron kept his election promise of a referendum on whether Britain should stay within the European Union or not.
Not won, and we voted to leave (yay), which prompted David Cameron to resign as Prime Minister and Tory leader, which paved way for the Tories second woman leader in Theresa May, who is not only the Tories second woman leader, but Britain second woman Prime Minister.
Labour had a pretty big year as well, firstly Labour won the London Mayoral election, Sadiq Khan beating Zac Goldsmith (despite being a Tory I was glad of this defeat for the Tories).
This is possibly the only good news Labour had all year.
The referendum on the EU was rather turbulent for Jeremy Corbyn's leadership. Firstly, he reluctantly backed to remain, and told his Labour MP's to not share a platform with the remain Tory politicians, I think some Labour politicians didn't get the message because Harriet Harman, Sadiq Khan, Tessa Jowell and ex Labour leader Neil Kinnock all shared a platform with the Tories......
Due Jeremy's lack of passion for the remain campaign, and the fact that remain lost, the "moderate" Labour MP's decided to start a coup against his leadership.
It started off with Hilary Benn, who was sacked for admitting to Jeremy what he was planning, which then saw a mass resignation.
Cornyn's leadership looked pathetic, the "moderates" then decided to wager a leadership bid against Corbyn, starting with Angela Eagle, who's big was rather doomed from the start, and then unknown MP Owen Smith.
Of course Jeremy Corbyn won, on my birthday no-less, with a higher majority than before. Was a wonderful present to give to me from the Labour party! Thank you.
Then of course there's USA's politics, Hilary Clinton vs Donald Trump.
A bit like being forced to choose between chlamydia or genital herpes, out of a population of 318 million these two were the finalists.
Sadly chlamydia won in the form of Donal Trump.
Donald Trump the worlds most homophobic, racist, misogynistic arse wank.
Then again a day before the voting Clinton thought it was vitally important to do the "mannequin" challenge with her celebrity friend Jon Bon Jovi.
The rest of the world had a pretty turbulent time, France and Belgium being hit from ISIS terrorist attacks, Syria is in a devastating state, Assad and his Russian and Iranian friends blasting bombs, as well as ISIS trying to fight back, with the people stuck in the middle.
The far right seems to be on the increase, especially in Europe.
So that's a quick over brief of 2016, what can 2017 offer.
Well what will happen is Donald Trump will go from President elect, to the President of the USA as Barack has to hand over the most powerful office in the world to a clown in a suit.
Theresa May will try to trigger article 50 to start the processing of Britain leaving the EU, which will more than likely be blocked by our democratically elected MP's.
This block may then make Theresa May trigger a snap election, which would be disastrous for Jeremy Corbyn has Labour are polling at all time lows at the moment, and therefore would most likely lose seats than gain any.
In fact Theresa May couldn't have a better opposition leader, Corbyn hasn't been seen doing or saying much lately, even one of closest allies, Len McCluskey the Unite Union leader, has said that if Corbyn keeps Labour this low in the polls he will have to go..... such a shame.
Also let's hope we see minimal terrorism attacks around the world, and Syrian people get to finally live in peace and rebuild their lives.
Let's also hope ISIS/IS/Daesh are defeated for good.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)