Meghan and Harry

I haven't watched the whole interview with Oprah, and I won't watch it.

I find it extremely hypocritical of them to want privacy, and then do everything in power to publicise themselves.

Firstly their arguments over Archie not being made a Prince because of his skin colour. Absolute rubbish. Prince Harry's children were NEVER up for becoming Prince's of Princess's until Prince Charles becomes King.

Surely Harry knew this.

Secondly, I have a real issue with Harry, not supporting his wife. For instance. Meghan, being an American will not have the knowledge that Brits do have when it comes to etiquette regarding The Queen.

The fact that Meghan has stated she had to Google what she had to makes me beg the question, where was Harry? Why wasn't he teaching, and supporting her from day one.

Is he that entitled that he honestly felt it was someone else's job to support his partner? Especially someone who comes from a different country, and culture.

Thirdly, the racism toward Archie from within the family. They should out the person who said it. You cannot sell a half truth, and just expect to be believed 100%, also it's unfair on the innocent who never made such a comment, if it is true. 

To me it looks like he didn't learn lessons from the way his father treated his mother, and made the same mistakes.

Then the accused can either apologise, and make amends, or deny that it was said, and if it is true, it's disgusting, vile, and yes it is racist. Why would that even be a question?!

Fourth, why are we pretending that they didn't make any mistakes. Why is it everyone else who is in the wrong, maybe they did some things wrong. The fact that they're unable to look at themselves, and blame the world shows the level of their narcissism.

Fifth, I honestly find it hard to believe Meghan had no-one to turn to. However I do believe that royal life was too much for her. I believe they did the right thing moving away. 

Yet, again Harry seems to be letting down Meghan again by not explaining the rules to her. 

The royal family didn't cut them off out sheer nastiness, they did it because they know the British public will not stand for paying for security of royals who have taken a backseat.

The fact the Harry hasn't explained that it comes out of our pocket to Meghan shows he's either in total denial of how the situation works, or that he doesn't care who foots the bill, as long as he gets what he wants.

Again Archie, and their future daughter were never in line to be given titles like Prince or Princess. 

From what I can see it's Harry who's let Meghan down, as well as the British people by turning his back on us.

Especially my generation who I know absolutely adored him, and we adored Meghan, we were happy to see him happy. How many hundreds of thousands of people turned out to cheer them on their wedding day? How many people travel thousands of miles to wish them luck for their future?

Not one mention of that.

Lastly, the antagonism between Kate and Meghan is sad. If they tried, which I honestly believe they could have BOTH done more to do so, although I am pretty sure both parties would argue with me and say they did, which says it all.

They could have been a powerhouse for women all over the world. They could have shown what sisterly love can achieve. 

Instead, they both decided against that.

I believe the main culprits of this bust is, Harry's ignorance in helping his future bride prepare properly for royal life, and the one thing I haven't mentioned, the people behind the scenes, the faceless advisers, and aides to the Royal family, I believe they do more medalling than the British Media could ever dream of doing.

All in all, it is a sad state of affairs. Meghan and Harry want privacy. Now keep quiet, stop shoving your faces into our homes. We are happy for you take a backseat. Now leave us alone.

The Royal family, if this racist comment on Archie's skin tone is true? The guilty party needs to educate themselves, maybe talk to the black community of this country, as well as others, to see and feel what they go through on a daily basis, purely because of the pigmentation of their skin. 

Review: THIS LAND: The Story Of A Movement Owen Jones

It's no surprise to anyone that I am NOT Owen Jones' biggest fan, nor am I one of his biggest haters either. In todays world I find him rather boring, and extremely predictable.

However, he did shock me when he decided to write about the troubles Corbyn and his team went through, whether that be self-inflicted wounds or internal sabotaging, or the (as Owen put it) "right wing press." especially so soon when I am sure the wounds are still healing.

So, I decided to read it (I haven't actually bought it, I downloaded it with a credit on my Audible).

Owen speaks of the late Tony Benn, with great passion, how his vision of a socialist Britain could have saved Labour in the 1970's from the "Winter of Discontent", and subsequent disastrous defeat, leading to Britain's first female Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher. 

However, Jones' love for Benn I find quite blinkered. Benn was a socialist in his words, but not in his actions. For example, selling his private diaries. The ONLY reason someone would sell their private diaries is for money, capitalising, and profit. (It's OK to live like a capitalist so long as you talk like a socialist.)

Also totally bi-passes the fact that Benn used a tax avoidance scheme so that those who inherited his £5 million fortune didn't pay too much inheritance tax. 

Then there is love to shout down the "right wing" presses denunciations of Corbyn from the moment it was clear the backbencher was going to win the leadership contest. 

"Terrorist Sympathiser" Jones reads as one of the many headlines that followed Corbyn's victory in 2015. Yet he does nothing to squash that headline, nothing to contradict it, mainly because Corbyn had snuggled up to many terrorist organisations, for example befriending ex IRA leader Gerry Adams in the 80's (possibly 70's I haven't a clue as to how long the two have known each other.), or even inviting terrorist organisations like Hezbollah to parliament "for tea."

Of course not ALL of Jones' denunciations were as briefly mentioned and I found he had purpose for his annoyances, however, not many.

I also found his argument of the "war from within" extremely one sided. He interviewed many people who were close to Corbyn, or at least a sympathetic ear to Corbyn, but not once did he go to the other side to hear their version.

Instead Jones' took the words of his fellow "comrades"(?) as gospel, and didn't bother properly investigating. 

For example, saying that Alan Johnson told one pro-Corbyn Labour MP to "Fuck Off". Never once did he go to Johnson to ask if it were true, or any reasonings behind this outburst if it were.

As well as "outing" a former Labour MP as possibly gay, extremely risky, and not at all fair, why he felt the right to publish this information is beyond me.

When it came to him writing about Corbyn's leadership skills, I found that he was grasping at straws. Corbyn, the man, the myth, the avoider.

The way Jones' writes about Corbyn's approach to issues, is almost like listening to my sister describe her 7 year old avoiding doing his homework, or the left try and describe Trump taking any criticisms. 

Ignoring anything issues that cropped up by not answering his phone, wearing a deliberate suit to let everyone know he wasn't happy (WTF?!), or just losing his temper like a toddler. Not turning up on time to prepare for interviews, and TV debates because he found them boring. Making tea whilst in the middle of an extremely important meeting.

Never once does Jones describe Corbyn as taking control of anything. Not pushing particularly hard on Iain McNichol (the then Labour chairman), regarding the process of investigating anti-semitism into the party.

Jones' obviously has a whole chapter dedicated to the anti-semitism crisis that Labour faced under Corbyn. Which I was pleasantly pleased to see.

Then when the chapter ended I was shocked, again not once did Owen go to the JLM, or an individual former Labour Jewish voter and ask why they felt unsafe with Corbyn at the helm.

Instead he tries to indulge us with the fact that Corbyn himself was "shocked" at being labelled as such, and in his shock decided to IGNORE all good advice as Corbyn's mind, that made him look guilty of anti-semitism himself, and almost tried to ignore the issue.

Now, I watch enough crime documentaries to inform you, it's almost like someone refusing to do a lie-detector test, it automatically (wrongly or rightly) makes you look guilty, more so than ever before.

It feels, through Jones' writing, that Corbyn tried to make himself look more guilty, or that he genuinely isn't that sharp and didn't understand that he was harming his own political future as leader, or indeed Prime Minister. 

In summary, Corbyn did nothing to help himself, it comes across as though he relied on everyone else to do it all for him, because he either found it boring, or he didn't like what he was hearing so instead of dealing with it he ran away.

Thank god he never won a general election. He, according to what I've read in Jones' book, wasn't ever fit to lead Labour let alone Britain. 

And as for Jones' account, extremely one sided, so much for equality!

USA Riots: Why I Agree

Not going to be a popular view with many people who I would normally agree with, however here is my reasoning why I agree with the riots going on in the USA.

In the past 10 years there have been so many innocent black people killed by police officers for no apparent reason.

1. Sandra Bland was arrested in 2015 for a broken tail light, which in the grand scheme of things is not a reason to arrest anyone. She was taken in, and a few hours later found dead in her cell by hanging. There are a lot of speculation as to whether she actually killed herself, or that she was dead when her mug shot was taken.

Let's all agree there was no reason to arrest her. Yes she had a broken tail light, and no she wasn't being rude, or attacking the arresting police officer, yet for some reason he still took her in. There is a video you can go and watch here.

2. Eric Garner was arrested for the possible possession of drugs. He didn't have any. He was killed by strangulation. He told the officer, who had unnecessarily got Eric in to an extremely tight headlock. In the video you can here Eric tell the officer "I can't breathe." The officer didn't let up, and Eric died for no reason.

Again he wasn't resisting arrest, he wasn't challenging the officers in anyway, and yet he was killed. You can watch it here.

3. Walter Scott, just like Sandra Bland, was pulled over for a broken tail light. Walter was shot at 8 times, of which 5 hit him. Walter himself was unarmed.

There was no reason to kill him. He was not a threat. It was a broken light.

4. George Floyd, just like Eric Garner, was suffocated because the police officer kneeled on his neck, and just like Eric Garner, he told him multiple times that he couldn't breathe. The police officer ignored and killed George, again for not good reason.


Now there have been spates of riots in different US cities such as Minnesota, Minneapolis (where George was murdered), Atlanta, and Detroit.

Of course I am sure there are many, many more where innocent black people have been either killed, or maimed by US Police Officers.

Now I am not someone who agrees with rioting lightly.

However, the murders of people just because of there skin colour does deserve to have anger. I am angry that there are white people who think they're above someone else just because of skin pigmentation. It's shameful, ridiculous and downright stupid.

I am agreeing with the rioting because sometimes you have to take extreme measures in order to get heard.

Barack Obama was president for three of the murders mentioned above, as we all know, Barack Obama is a black man. He did NOTHING.

President Trump has, and most likely, will do NOTHING.

They will do nothing, if people aren't shown to be angry, because politicians have this wonderful way of ignoring the will of the people, the people who put them into the position in first place.

I hope this will make Trump listen to people's anger. Listen to the fact that there IS a racist problem within the USA from those with the slightest bit of power, and someone who just happens to be black.

If no-one listens, and these murders carry on, these riots are only going to get worse. Listen, learn, and do something about it. Otherwise, Trump and whoever follows him, they will be the ones with blood on their hands, not the rioters, the politicians.

#GeneralElection2019

Two weeks until we take to the polls to decide between Johnson & Corbyn.

However, things haven't run as smoothly as last time for Labour & Corbyn.

Today the Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis wrote an article in The Times about the dangers of Corbyn becoming Prime Minister for not just the Jewish community but the 'soul of our nation@.

I have to agree. Corbyn is dangerous because, if he isn't anti-Semitic himself, he has been willingly blind towards it.

There has been countless complaints regarding anti-Semitism within the Labour Party, and they've done the bare minimum to combat it.

Even when BBC's Panorama did an investigation, Labour & Labour supporters laughed it off, and only spoke about the music, totally ignoring the fact the someone had genuinely thought about suicide because of it.

Labour & Corbyn aren't doing enough, or anything to put the Jewish community's mind at rest, and yet seem confused when people are still complaining about it.

Apparently there have cases of Labour canvassers arguing with people on their doorsteps over the issue.

Not to mention the fact that Labour want to prolong the Brexit issue by wanting ANOTHER 3 months to renegotiate a new deal with the EU, which they will then vote down in the House of Commons, and give the public another referendum between their new deal, which they would have just voted down, and remaining.

They've even said they would then campaign against their own new deal, and work for remain winning.

Jean-Claude Juncker has said he can't see the EU allowing another renegotiation.

The Conservative Party are the only party, apart from the Brexit Party, offering us a way out, of honoring the first referendum result, which has been, thanks to our democratic loving MPs, blocked at every corner.

Voting for the Conservatives is the only way to get Brexit out of the way, so we can start concentrating on other issues.

And then of course there is Labour's spending plans. Spending plans that would kill the country, see off entrepreneurs, and see unemployment grow to levels we can't even begin imagine.

Remember, Corbyn is a fan of Hugo Chavez, the late Venezuelan leader, and Maudro, the current Venezuelan leader, who's socialist policies have seen people having to eat their pets to stay alive.

Corbyn is a fan of Cuban's late dictator Castro, where you have to ask permission to change jobs, move house, go on holiday, and freedoms such as striking and protesting are illegal, and the only union is owned by the dictatorship.

Then there's Diane Abbott's defense of brutal Communist dictator Mao,, who's policies were a direct result in roughly 60 million deaths.

Or the ex Soviet Union, which Communist policies were the direct results in 39-52 million deaths.

I really cannot fathom why any decent intelligent people could possibly find any reason to vote for this extreme, left wing, anti-Semitic Labour Party.

And there I was thinking "RedEd" was dangerous!

Get. On. With. It

I don't know about you, but I have had my fill of watching MP's acting like spoiled brats, and to be honest, I have had enough of Brexit.

There isn't one side better than the other. The Tories are in just as much array as Labour are.

Labour is lead by a Brexiteer, but full of Remain MP's, and the Tories are lead by a soft Remain PM, who has tried her best to find the common ground, and failed of course, and won't help her, or the country out.

Here's my pledge to Mrs May. JUST LEAVE!!!

We voted, we knew what we were voting for, to leave the European Union. Why? Well because I can't stand to be lead by a misogynistic, drunk, unelected bureaucrat like Juncker.

MP's, you voted for Article 50 to be triggered, now respect it.

I don't care if you don't like it, I don't care if it's not what you want, it's what 17.4 million people want, and if not more.

Some of my extreme Remain friends would now vote leave because of the contempt you are treating the British people with.

And for those who say all Brexit voting people are racist. My friends of Indian, and Pakistani heritage voted to leave, what would you call them?!

So to the MP's, John Bercow, and the Prime Minister. Get on with it!! Otherwise you'll find yourselves all voted out of the job, and some new, possible more extreme parties will be made.

You're making the people angry, and that is one dangerous emotion to be playing around with

Deal or No Deal?

Theresa May, also my MP, has, I believe, done the best to get some sort of deal to leave the EU.

However, as she herself once said, "No deal, is better than a bad deal." And this deal is bad. Pro-EU and Brexiteers alike seem to think this.

So surely, you'd imagine, Mrs May would stick to her guns, and go through with no deal, and allow us and the EU to get deals sorted throughout the years?

Wee here lies the problem; it feels like parliament, and I don't care what colour rosette the pro-EU MPs wear, have done everything in their power to make sure we don't leave the EU, hence May getting such an awful deal, hence them making sure they can take no deal off of the table.

Extremely undemocratic, it shows that they have NOT listened to what the people, who voted them into parliament, want.

It shows the contempt that this parliament has for the people who without them, they would be in our position, ignored!

There also seems to be some people still wondering why people voted to leave. Unlike what LBC present James O'Brien would have you believe, not everyone who voted to leave did so because of immigration, but it did play a major part in reasons why, and here are some none racist reasons why:

People voted to leave because the EU was unwavering, as has been shown in the Brexit talks, on their stance of immigration, wanting to force us to take more, when majority of people were saying no.

People voted to leave because parties like Labour labelled you a racist when you voiced a small concern about immigration, remember Mrs Gillian Duffy? A Labour voter, labelled a "bigot" by then Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown, because she asked a valid question about Eastern European immigration.

Also, it felt like anything bad that happened, our politicians, had a nice little caveat to fall back on. "That's not our fault, that is the EU." And are now wondering why there was a huge mandate to leave.

Agree to Disagree

I've been listening to Labour MP Jess Philips on LBC today, standing in for usual host James O'Brien.

The abuse from one caller got me quite upset for her, not because Jess can't handle it, or that is in anyway bothered by it, but because it was totally and utterly hypocritical criticism from one of her own constituents.

The constituent, named Anne, started off rather nicely saying how she voted for her, but then went into overdrive because Jess doesn't 100% back Jeremy Corbyn, and asked her why she remained within the Labour Party.

Firstly, the pure and utter cheek of it! Firstly, Jeremy Corbyn voted AGAINST the Labour Party over 500 times, it doesn't matter who was leading, he voted against his own party, were there calls for him to leave Labour? No.

I haven't asked this question in a few years, but here I go again; why is it principals when Corbyn voted against the Labour party, but backstabbing when it's done to him.

Corbyn himself has had the bare faced cheek to criticise the 8 Labour MP's who have left to form The Independent Group, to say they were unloyal. Again Mr Corbyn, you voted against your own party over 500 times, where was your loyalty?

Secondly, Corbyn has said that Shamima Begun should not have had her British Citizenship revoked, and that we should bring her back and support her, yet his Shadow Chancellor had written a letter calling for people fighting for the Israeli Government, or on behalf of the Israeli state should have their citizenship's removed.

The hypocrisy, and two facedness of this current Labour leadership is embarrassing, and to be honest, unsurprising, but I honestly don't understand how anyone with an ounce of dignity, or common sense can stand up for them!

#LabourSplit

The Labour MP's, and possibly few Tory MP's, who will split from their parties to join a new, pro-EU party will not particularly damage the Tories, but definitely Labour.

This is, of course, if the split comes to anything at all, because it could be political suicide for the MP's who split.

However, there is every possibility that it won't be, and that means bad news for Labour.

Looks like Jeremy Corbyn should have been more decisive on Labour's Brexit strategy, instead of flip flopping the way he has.

So if this new party is a success, Corbyn has done exactly what I said he would, he's killed off the Labour Party, and possibly for good.

I've already seen quite a few tweets from people saying they're looking forward to a party being so pro-EU, such as from pro-EU actress Emma Kennedy

Anti-Semitism: When Will It End?

I am genuinely finding it terrifying that there are people out there, being blatantly anti-semitic, and yet are somehow getting away with it.

The Labour leadership's words mean nothing on the matter, because their lack of actions are speaking a heck of a lot louder!

It recently watched on Netflix a series called Hitler's Circle of Evil, and in that it explained how strongly the Nazi's hated the Jewish people, and how they slowly made anti-semitism the norm.

It feels like some parts of the Labour membership, as well as the Labour leadership, are trying to do the same thing.

However, unlike the Nazi's, Labour are thankfully not in a power.

For those denying that anti-semitism is a problem within Labour are either being deliberately blind, ignorant or are unknowingly (or knowingly) taking part the act itself.

What has Labour done to combat the problem? Nothing, despite John McDonnnell's words on Radio 4 the other day, in which he protested that Labour are doing something about it, what it was they were doing he never actually said (because it's nothing).

Luciana Berger, a Jewish Labour MP, is facing a no-confidence vote, therefore a deselection, from her constituency, McDonnell is trying to dress this up as "It's not because of anti-semitism, it's because she's been talking about a new party."

Labour, under the current lot, she never be allowed near the government, not only are they useless with numbers, they're openly racist.

May In Trouble? Not From Labour

Let's face facts, the fact that Jeremy Corbyn has put in a vote of no confidence on Theresa May means nothing.

He knows she'll win, and probably wants her to win, because let's face the facts, Labour are just as, if not more so, incompetent.

They have a Shadow Brexit Secretary who wants to over turn the 2016 referendum result, and a Labour leader who wants to please everyone and they refuse to see eye to eye.

Not sure if anyone sure the Labour front benches faces after Theresa May lost the Brexit vote last night..... they weren't happy!

Just look at the disappointed faces, even Keir Starmer looks shocked, and not a happy shocked. Jeremy Corbyn is burying his head, Emily Thornberry has her mouth covered, the rest just look shocked.

Why? Because they know their useless leader will put into motion the vote of no confidence against the Prime Minister, which they all know she will most likely win because majority of his own MP's can't stand him.

(Remember Corbyn lost his vote of no confidence, 172 Labour MP's to be precise)

Labour pose no threat, except to themselves.

We have a useless government, followed by and even more useless shadow government, what has become of British politics?

What A Croc of Sh*te

Sorry for the harsh title, but Owen Jones has hit a new level of bollocks.

Owen was having ago at people for writing for papers like The Sun, basically was calling them murderers.

But when it was pointed out to him that Owen himself had written for The Sun, his excuse was:

What a load of utter, stinking, rancid, bullsh*t.

What Owen has missed is, he may not have been paid by The Sun to write a column, but he did, and he did so that the sales of his new book would go up.

No he wasn't denouncing it, the only people to gain from his column, was Owen himself, of course his publishing company, and (ironically) The Sun, because for in order for people to read his column people would either have the physical paper, meaning they would have to search for his piece most likely reading other pieces in their search, or click on a link taking them to the website, which would have advertised their other columns, which people may have clicked on after reading Owen's.

This would be hilarious if it wasn't so pathetic, and self serving. How narcissistic do you have to be to write in a paper, you apparently hate, to gain more sales, therefore more profits, for your newly released book, which is called capitalising, an ideology you claim to also hate......

Then again, I do believe a lot of rich left wingers live by the motto "It's OK to live like a capitalist, so long as you talk like a socialist".

Thuggery

Yup, the far right have come out, and are being rather disgusting.

However, the far left are being ignored for their thuggery, why?!

Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, and so called journalist Owen Jones, spoke at a rally over the weekend, where communist flags were being flown.

Communism: the ideology that has been the direct result of over 100 million deaths.

Not only that they shared a platform with a man who said the Theresa May should shoot herself in the head.

And to be honest let's not forget that John McDonnell himself said the IRA should have been awarded, has a plaque from the IRA currently on his office wall, that he wanted to lynch Esther McVey, go back in time and assassinate Margaret Thatcher, wants all Tories to not to be able to walk in the streets without being harassed, and props up Jeremy Corbyn who's racism towards the Jews is disgusting.

Then of course there's Owen Jones, who will immediately have a go, and quite rightly, for being spat at, but when fellow journalist Owen Bennett was spat by left wing protesters at the Tory Party Conference a few years ago, had nothing to say.

It is amazing the level of hypocrisy, and down right nastiness from the left is being allowed. Why is it thuggery from far right, but activism from far left?

How to protest

Over 17 million people voted to leave, and people like Anna Soubry want to overturn this result, inevitably that WILL piss people off, however there are ways of going about it.

Even though you are angry, whether it be at the Tories policies, or Brexit, or the fact Labour is anti-Semitic, here's a few ways of having a protest without losing the argument.

Firstly, do NOT call someone a "Nazi" and verbally abuse them. How is that helping your cause? And what the hell has name calling got to do with why you're protesting?

Secondly, you've now lost the argument. People will NOT listen to the reasons why you're angry, you've crossed a line.

Thirdly, grow up, this is not a playground, act your age not your shoe size.

Lastly, do NOT swing from the cenotaph, again people won't see the reason why you're there, but they will concentrate on your stupid actions.

If you want to protest, by all means go and protest, but don't act like a petulant child.

Organise a protest, organise an online petition, or go round knocking door to door to get signatures, write to your MP, or even the MP who you are opposing stating why you think they're wrong, again try to avoid name calling, once they see that they will not read on, and once again you've lost the argument.

I do not go on protest personally, as I do not think they work. 1 million people marched against the Iraq war, yet it still went ahead.

How many protests were held under the coalition government? How many were listened to?

But I have no objections to them. Absolutely show your anger, but please do it in a grown up manner, this goes for all sides, and any protest.

Corbyn: The Most Ineffectual Leader Ever

UPDATE: Since I wrote this the Tories have a 4 point lead over Labour... after these few disastrous months, the Tories are somehow still seen more of a trustworthy party than Corbyn's Labour

I don't watch PMQs anymore. Why? Well Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn are hardly worth the watch.

However, during yesterday's PMQs, I do read tweets about it afterwards, apparently Corbyn "demanded" something from the Prime Minister.

Now normally if an opposition leader "demands" something from their counter part, it's in the news, perhaps even makes headlines.

However, the only paper to announce that Corbyn was "demanding" anything from the PM was Corbyn friendly newspaper The Guardian, no-one else, even other Corbyn supporting papers like the Independent, even mentioned this.

The Prime Minister has a lot of trouble, she's just survived a vote of confidence from her MPs, unlike Corbyn who lost his.

As well as troubles because of her ill drawn deal with the EU.

Yet despite Mrs May's troubles, having an efficient opposition leader is not one of them. You would reckon that Labour, or at least Mr Corbyn would jump at the opportunity to take her down once and for all.

Instead, he's doing the odd bit of "demanding" that no-one is paying attention to, and he himself can't get a stance on Brexit.

Ed Mililband wasn't exactly a fantastic leader, but at least we know where he stands on Brexit, and what stance he and the Labour Party would have taken by now.

Unlike Corbyn, who seems incapable of making a stance.

Corbyn might as well not be there in Westminster, because his presence means nothing, his demands mean nothing, and he has absolutely nothing to say.

Standing Up For May

This will not be a popular blog, if at all anyone reads it, with my fellow Conservatives, however I am going to stand up for Theresa May.

For some unknown reason, she wanted to take over the the yellow bellied, coward that is David Cameron (who apparently wants to come back to politics because he's bored!)

Theresa May has taken on a impossible task, to please anyone.

I am not happy with overall result of the Brexit deal, however I do realise she was never going to get the perfect deal.

Also trying to please the Remainers, that was never going to happen because they lost and obviously don't want to leave, as Sir Keir Starmer keeps saying "Brexit can be stopped."

No. No it can't.

Anyway, as unhappy as I am, at least she's stuck it out, unlike the other cowards within the Tory party such as Boris Johnson, and David Davis.

They had every opportunity to shape the Brexit negotiations, but instead they left the cabinet like a toddler not getting the chocolate bar they wanted, and now they have the audacity to moan about it!

Why didn't you stick with it if you're so passionate about getting us a good deal? Why did you run the very moment you didn't get what you wanted? Why don't you both grow a backbone and admit the fact that you left your positions made it worse for us?

I'll answer it for you shall I? Because it's a ploy to get rid of May, a ploy that so far has failed. I do NOT see future leaders in either Davis or Johnson, I see cowards, I see backstabbers, I see liars.

They're not that passionated about Brexit as much as they are their own positions within the government, or at least the party itself.

Pathetic! You SHOULD have stuck to your positions, and you SHOULD have worked a damn sight harder to get us a better deal, but as I said before, you stomped your feet and ran.

Theresa May, whether she's got us a good deal or not, has taken personal criticism, had NO help from her fellow colleagues, instead has had to put with children in the bodies of supposed men.

The Last Tsar

The last Tsar of Russia, Nicholas Romanov ii, and his family were executed 100 years ago today.

They were murdered by intoxicated, and inadequate executioners, then were further humiliated in death as the "soldiers" defiled their bodies, and crudely cut up for disposal, some where even melted in acid, whilst others were burnt.

Why were they murdered? Despite the fact they had been imprisoned since Nicholas had abdicated as Tsar, the unelected communist dictator Vladir Lenin still feared them..... Pathetic.

I often find myself wondering why anyone has given this so called "revolutionary" any time of day, let alone the hoards of people that still worship him.

Now Nicholas ii was no saint, and he wasn't clever. He was a slightly dumb autocrat who was easily swayed by his wife, Alexandra, who was clever, by tainted by the strains that their son and heir, Alexei, had hemophilia. (Hemophilia is a disease were the blood is unable to clot, therefore a small bump can cause an internal bleed that may never stop and result in death.)

Not to mention that she was on all sorts of medication for many ailments, many of the medicines contained cocaine, it's no wonder a mystic healer, such as Grigori Rasputin, was able to take such a hold over her, and the Tsar, and help bring down the monarchy.

All their judgement were clouded by the fact that their son was in constant danger of dying at any given time, and that somehow Rasputin had the power to calm their every aching son.

Whereas Lenin was consumed by the want of power. Nothing more, and nothing less.

Ironically, there wasn't that much of a revolution when Lenin came. Just like the Tsar, Lenin held all the power, but instead of being called an autocrat, he was a dictator.

Just like the Tsar, Lenin had a secret police. Before they were called the Okranah, under Lenin they were called the Cheka.

Just like the Okranah before them, the Cheka were there to rat out any dissenters, who were put just jail, just as it was under the Tsar, the only change now was who the dissenters were.

"Peace, land and bread!" The dictator cried.

Well, yes Lenin did take Russia out of WWI, however a civil war soon pursued, and things hadn't really changed.

The land he promised he owned, the peasants never got a single part of it. Just like it was with the Tsar.

Famines were widespread under Lenin's Russia. How?

Well rather like the Tsar he reaped the rewards for himself, or the land owners, and if you were a peasant caught taking more than your rationed amount, which was far less then what the Tsar had rationed for, then you were sent to prison.

So when it comes to revolution, I am not sure there really was much of one, except the face changed, and the title to whom was now in charge.

The Tsar and his family needn't have been murdered, it was the act of a coward.

The Tsar should have listened to those wishing to help, he should have modernised.

Sadly for the Tsar Nicolas, his wife Alexandra, their four daughters Olga, Titiana, Maria, and Anastasia, and their younger brother Alexie, down a basement where their executioners stood drunk in front of them, guns pointing, knowing that their lives were officially over.

How Low Can They Go?

How low, and vile can the Labour Party get?

Apparently extremely low, and vile. A minutes silence for Dame Tessa Jowell, who sadly passed away earlier this month, was interrupted because she worked closely with Tony Blair.

I am a Conservative, and I would have gladly stood for a minutes silence. Yes on many issues I am sure we disagreed, but I have the decency to respect her views, and respect her as a person.

Corbynista's? Nope, you don't agree with us, we will not show any respect, or any decorum for anyone.

Dame Tessa was a proud feminist, bloody good politician, and from what I have read about people who knew her, a genuinely lovely person.

When will Corbyn, and his followers such as Owen Jones, condemn those who behaved utterly digustingly?

Oh that's right, they won't! Why? Because it fits their agenda.

Yes I disagreed with Blair, Brown, and Miliband, but I had respect for them, Corbyn and co? What's to respect? I am embarrassed that this is what it has come down too.

Utterly Shambolic

When I think of the Labour Party, I generally think economically illiterate, however good hearts.

That was until Mr Corbyn and his nasty bunch took over.

Apparently, whilst discussing the Anti-Semitic problems Labour have been having since Mr Corbyn's win back in September 2015, they left out the people who are actually facing the problem, the Jewish Labour Movement.

Not only that they allowed someone, who is currently being investigated for Anti-Semitic remarks, to not only stand in last weeks local elections, but win!

The Labour Party is NOT serious about Anti-Semitism, it's obvious Corbyn and his crew don't care that Jews are being persecuted for no good reason, if anything they sympathise with Anti-Semitic views.

Their lack of action on the matter makes this clear.

Corbyn is ruining the Labour Party, he is denying the country of a decent opposition on holding the government to account, and hasn't a backbone to deal with racism within his own party.

What a shambolic bunch of wank stains they really are!

What Absolute Bollocks

Labour is no longer a political party, but just a group people chatting bollocks, victimising those they disagree with, yet trying to come across as the victim themselves.

Labour are asking for Theresa May and Amber Rudd to resign, ignoring the fact that they had thirteen whole years in office where they could have done something regarding the Windrush scandal. But in true Labour style, they didn't.

It was under the last Labour government that ignored the hacking scandals, only because the people committing the hackings were their paymasters. It took a Tory led coalition government to bring an end to it. One of the funniest things about the whole scandal? John Prescott was hacked, the then deputy Prime Minister. Not exactly a great advertisement for wanting to become the new governing party is it?

It was also the Labour produced the very stupid, and very racist "immigration mug" under so called "moderate" then Labour leader Ed Milliband!

It is also Labour, a party who is lead by a man who said he would bring a "kinder, and gentler politics" to the table, currently undergoing an existential crisis of anti-Semitism. It is also the same man who said he wanted a "kinder, and gentler politics" who is doing absolutely bugger all about it.

His meeting with Jewish leaders ended up with him just excusing the bahviour. Why? Because the minimal Corbyn sympathises, and empathises with anti-Semitic views, if not agrees.

He has called the known terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah "friends". He has reluctantly suspended known anti-Semites from the party, only to allow them back in.

The Labour party is being headed by a man who refuses to condemn the actions of the Syrian regime, which chemically bombs it's own people for no apparent reason.

A man who thought terrorist like the IRA were worth listening too, and even stood still for a minutes silence commemorating 8 dead IRA soldiers.

A man who has now been endorsed by ex BNP leader Nick Griffin, and their only remaining councillor. In fact Corbyn is probably a man who wouldn't have backed going into World War II.

Labour are no position to be lecturing anyone on decency, morals, or racism. Perhaps if they sorted out their own shit, and got rid of Corbyn and his thugs, then and only then could they cast dispersion's on anyone else.

People in glass houses, shouldn't throw stones.

Syria

Whether people agree with Theresa May or not, she has shown real leadership.

People like Owen Jones, who oppose because they're stuck in the past of the Iraq invasion, are not listening to her words.

Theresa May does NOT want to overthrow Assad, she wants him to stop chemically bombing his people.

Why not talk to him then? I hear people cry, well I will answer with a question.

Is someone who, for no apparent reason, chemically bombs their own people, really the type of person to change their mind because they've been spoken to? No, he isn't.

It's not like a parent getting their own back on their kids by saying "I'm not angry, just disappointed." Assad is a brutal dictator, and will only understand brute force.

Jeremy Corbyn has proven time and time again he sympathises with extremist views, such as the IRA, Russia, Cuba, and now the Syrian regime.

He idolises people like Castro, Stalin, and Lenin, all of whom have one thing in common, they're all dictators.

Theresa May was correct to do what she did, Jeremy Corbyn is living in a ideological world, which doesn't exist.