I'm not going to blame Jeremy Corbyn for his supporters being vile, nasty, and racist, but the ugly side of Labour has popped it's ugly head up ever since he was elected last September.
Corbyn himself is a hypocrite, calling Hamas and other known terrorist organisations friends. He is close friends with ex IRA leader Gerry Adams, and even gave a minute silence to eight killed IRA bombers. As well as speaking at many rallies where posters, and pictures are depicting violence.
Ever since becoming leader of the Labour party Corbyn has said he wants the people to dictate what Labour's policies will be, yet when it comes to The Falklands, where an overwhelming majority voted to stay part of the Great Britain, yet he will quite happily ignore this, and would negotiate with Argentina, despite what the people voted for.
As well as John McDonnell, Corbyn's shadow Chancellor, saying he would go back in time to assassinate Thatcher, and praised the IRA's past demeanours.
Ken Livingstone, an executive member of the NEC, once said that he didn't want rich Jewish people voting for him.
Today on LBC Ken said, in a roundabout way, it's OK to support Hamas as they were elected...... so was Hitler, but it's a taboo to support Nazism (quite rightly)
Hamas kill gay people, kill women who have been raped, fire at Israel from schools and hospitals so that they fire back at the schools and hospitals, then complain about Israel killing their vulnerable.
But it's OK to support them, they were elected.
Corbyn and co have turned the Labour party from a joke, into an ugly, hateful, spiteful party of depressants.
Blogging about British politics, sometimes international political events, all views expressed are my own
Wednesday, 17 February 2016
Monday, 15 February 2016
Why Is the Left So Pro-EU?
The left are all about accountability, that's one of the main reasons they like the idea of nationalisation.
If something goes wrong, there's one source to blame, the government.
There's a reason why David Cameron wants to stay party of the EU, if anything goes wrong he can put the blame on a few of these people:
The unelected President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker, the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, those behind the scenes who we haven't got a clue who they are, the MEP's who's role is to what I am not sure.
All of whom have to bare their fair share of the blame, but how much does each person take?
There is no one person who is accountable, there are too many people to put the blame onto, and what portion of blame they deserve is also unknown.
For instance the immigration crisis, Merkel is to blame, she allowed the immigrants to flood into Germany, which has now helped created animosity towards all immigrants, as well as the EU itself.
The EU's treatment of Greece was despicable, but they have gotten away with it, as there is no one person to blame.
There isn't that accountability.
Again I ask, why do the left want to hold on to one of the most undemocratic, unaccountable power's in the world?
If something goes wrong, there's one source to blame, the government.
There's a reason why David Cameron wants to stay party of the EU, if anything goes wrong he can put the blame on a few of these people:
The unelected President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker, the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, those behind the scenes who we haven't got a clue who they are, the MEP's who's role is to what I am not sure.
All of whom have to bare their fair share of the blame, but how much does each person take?
There is no one person who is accountable, there are too many people to put the blame onto, and what portion of blame they deserve is also unknown.
For instance the immigration crisis, Merkel is to blame, she allowed the immigrants to flood into Germany, which has now helped created animosity towards all immigrants, as well as the EU itself.
The EU's treatment of Greece was despicable, but they have gotten away with it, as there is no one person to blame.
There isn't that accountability.
Again I ask, why do the left want to hold on to one of the most undemocratic, unaccountable power's in the world?
Friday, 5 February 2016
The UNlawful "Detention" of #Assange: Utter Bollocks
The UN has declared Julian Assange has been unlawfully detained within Ecuador's Embassy in London.
Utter Bollocks.
Firstly, as we all know, Julian took REFUGE in the Ecuadorian Embassy, he was not detained.
Also, if he was being "detained" it wouldn't have been by Britain, or Sweden, but Ecuador, seeming as it was their embassy in which he was staying.
Thirdly, what about the questions he is faced with in Sweden of rape? Surely he has an obligation to prove his innocents? Surely something as serious as rape/ sexual assault charges take a bigger president over whether he's been "unlawfully" detained or not?
This, to me and many others has put the meaning of the UN under question.
Unless of course, the UN is taking Assange's side because he has some dirt on them, in which he has threatened to "leak" if they go against him.
Guess we'll never know, however, I do know one thing, he was not being "detained", he entered the embassy to avoid being extradited to Sweden for the sexual assault/ rape allegations, and to the USA for his "Wikileaks".
Arrest him, make him face the allegations, especially of rape/ sexual assault, and let him clear his name, otherwise to many of us, he looks more and more guilty.
Utter Bollocks.
Firstly, as we all know, Julian took REFUGE in the Ecuadorian Embassy, he was not detained.
Also, if he was being "detained" it wouldn't have been by Britain, or Sweden, but Ecuador, seeming as it was their embassy in which he was staying.
Thirdly, what about the questions he is faced with in Sweden of rape? Surely he has an obligation to prove his innocents? Surely something as serious as rape/ sexual assault charges take a bigger president over whether he's been "unlawfully" detained or not?
This, to me and many others has put the meaning of the UN under question.
Unless of course, the UN is taking Assange's side because he has some dirt on them, in which he has threatened to "leak" if they go against him.
Guess we'll never know, however, I do know one thing, he was not being "detained", he entered the embassy to avoid being extradited to Sweden for the sexual assault/ rape allegations, and to the USA for his "Wikileaks".
Arrest him, make him face the allegations, especially of rape/ sexual assault, and let him clear his name, otherwise to many of us, he looks more and more guilty.
Thursday, 4 February 2016
How Can We Help When We're Struggling As It Is?
To those who are saying Britain could do more to take in the Syrian refugees, I have a few questions for you.
Where will they live?
As we all know Britain has a housing shortage, people are stuck on waiting which are 5 years long! If we're struggling with the people we already have, how can we legitimately, and fairly help others?
How will our already over worked social workers cope?
Again, we already know that our social services are stretched to the limit, how will the cope with even more cases loaded on to them?
Also how is this being fair to either side? What if the over stretched social worker misses clues of abuse because they're trying to help god knows how many other children?
How will already cram stuffed schools cope? How will that benefit the children's education? That being of the children already here, and the children coming here?
Surely before we can help anyone, we have to deal with these issues first? Otherwise we're just going to add to the problems making it that much harder to resolve.
To me it seems more unfair to bring people here, where they is no housing, and not the correct support for them.
It's unfair on the people who are seeking our help, and it's unfair on our society to stretch it further.
I say, fix our internal problems, then we can truly help those who need it.
Where will they live?
As we all know Britain has a housing shortage, people are stuck on waiting which are 5 years long! If we're struggling with the people we already have, how can we legitimately, and fairly help others?
How will our already over worked social workers cope?
Again, we already know that our social services are stretched to the limit, how will the cope with even more cases loaded on to them?
Also how is this being fair to either side? What if the over stretched social worker misses clues of abuse because they're trying to help god knows how many other children?
How will already cram stuffed schools cope? How will that benefit the children's education? That being of the children already here, and the children coming here?
Surely before we can help anyone, we have to deal with these issues first? Otherwise we're just going to add to the problems making it that much harder to resolve.
To me it seems more unfair to bring people here, where they is no housing, and not the correct support for them.
It's unfair on the people who are seeking our help, and it's unfair on our society to stretch it further.
I say, fix our internal problems, then we can truly help those who need it.
Wednesday, 20 January 2016
Leave The Falklands Alone!
Why is Corbyn hell bent on ignoring the people of the Falkland Islands?
He keeps repeating that he'd do negotiations with Argentina, despite in 2013 the Falklander's overwhelming voting stay part of Great Britain.
This is a man who has said he wants the people to decide most of Labour's policies, yet here he is sticking his fingers in his ears when it comes to The Falklands.
99.8% voted to stay with GB, 0.20% voted against. Thats 1,513 people vs 3 people.
So why is Corbyn being such a hypocrite? Why is Corbyn even bringing this up so soon after the referendum? Why is he ignoring the people of The Falklands?
Corbyn is a classic case of a far left wing leader, he says one thing, but does another.
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Chavez, Castro etc, they all promised the people one thing, but did the complete opposite once in power.
He keeps repeating that he'd do negotiations with Argentina, despite in 2013 the Falklander's overwhelming voting stay part of Great Britain.
This is a man who has said he wants the people to decide most of Labour's policies, yet here he is sticking his fingers in his ears when it comes to The Falklands.
99.8% voted to stay with GB, 0.20% voted against. Thats 1,513 people vs 3 people.
So why is Corbyn being such a hypocrite? Why is Corbyn even bringing this up so soon after the referendum? Why is he ignoring the people of The Falklands?
Corbyn is a classic case of a far left wing leader, he says one thing, but does another.
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Chavez, Castro etc, they all promised the people one thing, but did the complete opposite once in power.
Monday, 18 January 2016
Common Sense Should Be Renamed
They call it common sense, but in actual fact it seems very rare to come across someone who's actually got it.
Jeremy Corbyn is certainly lacking in it.
Yesterday's interview on the BBC's Marr Show was beyond ridiculous, and Marr allowed him to speak, as the saying goes, give them enough rope, they'll hang themselves.
Firstly his return to flying pickets, and secondary strike action is something Sir Michael Foot would have supported back in 1983!
To what purpose would this serve? How would it help any causes if it didn't before?
His repitive use of the words "grotesque" "NHS" and "Housing" were rather boring, just attacking the Tories with no actual plan himself, but then again that's not different to any other Labour leader.
Then of course was his bizarre idea to rid the Trident Submarines of their warheads....... because empty submarines are a terrifying thought!
When criticised, he cannot for the life of him, see why.
The problem with Corbyn, his allies within the Shadow Cabinet, and his followers? They're suffering from tunnel vision.
With the new report coming out about why, and how Labour lost so badly last May will not change their views, they will not deviate from their mission.
This is admirable, but also a stupid stance to have, then again the far left have never been that good on compromising, which is one of the very reasons it keeps failing.
Jeremy Corbyn is certainly lacking in it.
Yesterday's interview on the BBC's Marr Show was beyond ridiculous, and Marr allowed him to speak, as the saying goes, give them enough rope, they'll hang themselves.
Firstly his return to flying pickets, and secondary strike action is something Sir Michael Foot would have supported back in 1983!
To what purpose would this serve? How would it help any causes if it didn't before?
His repitive use of the words "grotesque" "NHS" and "Housing" were rather boring, just attacking the Tories with no actual plan himself, but then again that's not different to any other Labour leader.
Then of course was his bizarre idea to rid the Trident Submarines of their warheads....... because empty submarines are a terrifying thought!
When criticised, he cannot for the life of him, see why.
The problem with Corbyn, his allies within the Shadow Cabinet, and his followers? They're suffering from tunnel vision.
With the new report coming out about why, and how Labour lost so badly last May will not change their views, they will not deviate from their mission.
This is admirable, but also a stupid stance to have, then again the far left have never been that good on compromising, which is one of the very reasons it keeps failing.
Friday, 15 January 2016
I've Left The Conservative Party
I am sorry to say can no longer be part of the
Conservatives
.
Yes, I will back some of their policies, but others just
seem downright mean, and others are carrying on Blair’s work of creating a
nanny state.
I don’t want the government telling me what I can and can’t
eat, I already know what’s bad for, what’s good for, it’s just a matter of
will.
I’ve got friends who failed their Maths GCSE, yet are
brilliant calorie counters, they don’t need Cameron pretending to care by
imposing another tax on them.
Another problem I find, and this is where I am sure many
Conservatives are going to disagree with me, is that the Tories are just being
mean sometimes.
Take for instance tax credits, something created by Gordon
Brown, shouldn’t be there, however, it is, and people who are in lowed paid
jobs are relying on it, what are the Tories planning to do? Just take it away.
How is that fair on those who are working hard?
For me the Conservative Party is meant to be there for those
who do have aspirations, for those who are working hard, but getting no breaks.
Instead this government seems to be hell bent on either
bringing up the past, or blaming someone else.
Cameron is also an annoyance, his smarmy appearances at
Prime Ministers Questions every week is beyond boring now, we didn’t elect you
to be a stand up Dave, we want a Prime Minister, a statesman.
Also his attitude towards us, the voters, the people who put
him where he is, echoes that of Tony Blair, it’s like he looks down on us from
on high. I fear he’s forgotten what it’s like being in opposition, he’s
completely lost touch.
I went to CCHQ to help out a friend with some calling, &
Cameron was the special guest who arrived, he obviously thinks a lot of
himself, and with the grace of a dying giraffe he said “I am going to dinner now
to raise money so you can do this.” Then laughed.
We were volunteering!!! What the hell needed paying for?!
As well as Cameron’s friends within government, Jeremy Hunt
for example, a pathetic man who can preach to the already converted, but
useless when put under pressure from opponents.
Does Jeremy even care about the NHS? I don’t believe so, all
I keep hearing is more cuts, and then them trying to spin it as a raise…… we’re
not stupid.
At the Tory Conference back in October, I spoke to many
people who either worked in the NHS, or had family or friends working within
the NHS, and they all said, “He’s going too far.”
Also the conference itself for me was a first, now bare with
me, it’s a bit of a role play the next part.
I believe it was the second day of the conference, and I
went to get a drink, as I gave the man my money but the till jammed, he looked
at me apologetically, but we all know shit happens, and I smiled.
A man then stood behind me, impatiently, he could see there
was a problem with the till, but that wasn’t his problem was it? Oh no.
He then pushed past me, “Can I have a bottle of water.”
“In a minute sir, the till’s stuck.” He said, again
apologetically.
“Look here’s £3, please just get me a bottle of water!” He
said, whilst slamming down his money on the counter.
The waiter looked helplessly at me as he was holding up the
till whilst his colleague tried to fix it at the back.
“Hang on.” He then whispered to his colleague, who now had
to hold the till. He grabbed the water, and gave it to the impatient man.
“About time.” He said as he snatched it, and stormed off mumbling
something under his breath.
I stood there waiting patiently, as I said shit happens,
within seconds of the rude bloke buggering off, the till worked, I got my
change and drink, and gave the man an apologetic smile.
Now I told you that story because, how I view that impatient
man, is how I view the Tories. No compassion, no thinking of others, just
themselves.
For instance, Zac Goldsmith, I also met him at the
conference, very easy on the eye, but a little bit like Hunt, no backbone.
Goldsmith has decided he’s against expanding Heathrow, and
as he’s running to become London’s next Mayor the government has decided to
delay its decision whether to expand it or not.
To me that’s putting Party before country, and that’s not
something I signed up to when I joined them.
Even if the government chooses not to, get it over and done
with now, people’s future are waiting on this decision, not just homes, but
jobs too.
Now I am not tarring all Conservative MPs with the same
brush, I like Henry Smith, MP for Crawley, who I went and canvassed for, or
even Theresa May who’s my MP, who I think is a half decent Home Secretary and
has more balls that most of the men in the cabinet.
But Cameron and his mates, I have no time for anymore.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)