Justice

From the shocking and disturbing events that happened in Norway, adn what Joshua Davies did, the young boy who murdered his ex-girlfriend for a dare to win a breakfast.

Now, I understand that even if we had harder sentencing people would still rape, and murder, and commit crimes. It seems some people don't understand right from wrong.

Europe has one of the lightest criminal justice system. The maniac Anders Behring Breivik will only get 21 years maximum, Joshua Davies is serving a life sentence, of probably only 30 years, and will most likely be let out on good behaviour after 10 or 15. To me that is not a life sentence.

I do believe Anders Breivik should get 21 years, for each murder he commited, that is 76 people which would equal  1596 years, even if he did get some years taken off for good behaviour, he would never get out. Good! He obviously is good for society, mentally he is obviously not on the same wave length as the rest of us. He pleaded not guilty to the murders or any of his crimes, believing he had a right to act out his actions, because he doesn't like Muslims.

Joshua Davies, smiling as he entered the court, believing he would lie his way out of murdering a fifteen year old, and be able to frame his friend for the girls murder. He honestly believed he could get away with murder. He also did it to get a free breakfast. Something isn't right within our system if children think getting a free breakfast is worth killing someone over.

If the justice system was harder, and jail life wasn't as cosy, I do believe a lot of young people wouldn't find killing such a fun thing to do. Stabbings in London wouldn't be as often, maybe setting up gangs wouldn't be such a great idea.

I remember at school, we didn't care if we got caught skipping lessons, or even school as there was no consquence. I never did homework, and hardly ever got told off for it, and to be honest I didn't care. A friend of mine got caught with possession of drugs, two weeks left of school so they suspended her for two weeks, all she got was an extra two week holiday, and the rest of us were jealous!

This is why we should remove Sky TV from prisons, remove nice pool tables, and remove these lovely living conditions. Where is the punishment? They get three whole meals a day, at our expense, Sky TV at our expense, pools tables that get fixed if broken, at our expense, nice new matresses, at our expense.

Now, I'm not saying they shouldn't get food, but they should earn the moeny for the food instead of us buying it for them! In America, the prisoners have to go out chained up and do community service......Good!

All these liberals who disagree that rapists and murders should get punished and deserve a second chance, why? The person they have murdered, or raped doesn't get a second chance. The family has to suffer a consequence of their actions, why shouldn't they also suffer?

For instance, James Bulger, the little two year old boy who got brutally murdered by two ten year olds, Jon Venable and Robert Thompson. Both who practically, in my eyes, got away with what they commited. I realise they were only ten, I realise they got taken away from their families. But did they learn from their ordeal, it seems not because Venables is now in prison serving time for child pornography. Not only that, suring the Fifa World Cup last year, he asked for a better telly because his eyes were straining to see the small telly he had already got. I bet half the prison guards couldn't afford the telly he was given.

Our crime system is too soft. Do-gooders are saying the deserve second chances, they should be allowed back into society, back to live a nice normal life. But if that rapist or murder or paedophile was placed where thye lived, I bet they would have something to say about that!

When you're little you know not to put your hand in the fire, because you will get burnt, in other words, there is a consequence! And if you were the child who did put your hand in the fire, I bet you never did it again!