Kinder, Gentler Politics?

I'm not going to blame Jeremy Corbyn for his supporters being vile, nasty, and racist, but the ugly side of Labour has popped it's ugly head up ever since he was elected last September.

Corbyn himself is a hypocrite, calling Hamas and other known terrorist organisations friends. He is close friends with ex IRA leader Gerry Adams, and even gave a minute silence to eight killed IRA bombers. As well as speaking at many rallies where posters, and pictures are depicting violence.

Ever since becoming leader of the Labour party Corbyn has said he wants the people to dictate what Labour's policies will be, yet when it comes to The Falklands, where an overwhelming majority voted to stay part of the Great Britain, yet he will quite happily ignore this, and would negotiate with Argentina, despite what the people voted for.

As well as John McDonnell, Corbyn's shadow Chancellor, saying he would go back in time to assassinate Thatcher, and praised the IRA's past demeanours.

Ken Livingstone, an executive member of the NEC, once said that he didn't want rich Jewish people voting for him.

Today on LBC Ken said, in a roundabout way, it's OK to support Hamas as they were elected...... so was Hitler, but it's a taboo to support Nazism (quite rightly)

Hamas kill gay people, kill women who have been raped, fire at Israel from schools and hospitals so that they fire back at the schools and hospitals, then complain about Israel killing their vulnerable.

But it's OK to support them, they were elected.

Corbyn and co have turned the Labour party from a joke, into an ugly, hateful, spiteful party of depressants.

Why Is the Left So Pro-EU?

The left are all about accountability, that's one of the main reasons they like the idea of nationalisation.

If something goes wrong, there's one source to blame, the government.

There's a reason why David Cameron wants to stay party of the EU, if anything goes wrong he can put the blame on a few of these people:

The unelected President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker, the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, those behind the scenes who we haven't got a clue who they are, the MEP's who's role is to what I am not sure.

All of whom have to bare their fair share of the blame, but how much does each person take?

There is no one person who is accountable, there are too many people to put the blame onto, and what portion of blame they deserve is also unknown.

For instance the immigration crisis, Merkel is to blame, she allowed the immigrants to flood into Germany, which has now helped created animosity towards all immigrants, as well as the EU itself.

The EU's treatment of Greece was despicable, but they have gotten away with it, as there is no one person to blame.

There isn't that accountability.

Again I ask, why do the left want to hold on to one of the most undemocratic, unaccountable power's in the world?

The UNlawful "Detention" of #Assange: Utter Bollocks

The UN has declared Julian Assange has been unlawfully detained within Ecuador's Embassy in London.

Utter Bollocks.

Firstly, as we all know, Julian took REFUGE in the Ecuadorian Embassy, he was not detained.

Also, if he was being "detained" it wouldn't have been by Britain, or Sweden, but Ecuador, seeming as it was their embassy in which he was staying.

Thirdly, what about the questions he is faced with in Sweden of rape? Surely he has an obligation to prove his innocents? Surely something as serious as rape/ sexual assault charges take a bigger president over whether he's been "unlawfully" detained or not?

This, to me and many others has put the meaning of the UN under question.

Unless of course, the UN is taking Assange's side because he has some dirt on them, in which he has threatened to "leak" if they go against him.

Guess we'll never know, however, I do know one thing, he was not being "detained", he entered the embassy to avoid being extradited to Sweden for the sexual assault/ rape allegations, and to the USA for his "Wikileaks".

Arrest him, make him face the allegations, especially of rape/ sexual assault, and let him clear his name, otherwise to many of us, he looks more and more guilty.

How Can We Help When We're Struggling As It Is?

To those who are saying Britain could do more to take in the Syrian refugees, I have a few questions for you.

Where will they live?

As we all know Britain has a housing shortage, people are stuck on waiting which are 5 years long! If we're struggling with the people we already have, how can we legitimately, and fairly help others?

How will our already over worked social workers cope?

Again, we already know that our social services are stretched to the limit, how will the cope with even more cases loaded on to them?

Also how is this being fair to either side? What if the over stretched social worker misses clues of abuse because they're trying to help god knows how many other children?

How will already cram stuffed schools cope? How will that benefit the children's education? That being of the children already here, and the children coming here?

Surely before we can help anyone, we have to deal with these issues first? Otherwise we're just going to add to the problems making it that much harder to resolve.

To me it seems more unfair to bring people here, where they is no housing, and not the correct support for them.

It's unfair on the people who are seeking our help, and it's unfair on our society to stretch it further.

I say, fix our internal problems, then we can truly help those who need it.